Skip to main content

Black-Litterman Model with Multiple Experts’ Linguistic Views

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Methods for Data Science (SMPS 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 456))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents fuzzy extensions of the Black-Litterman portfolio selection model. Black and Litterman identified two sources of information about expected returns and combined these two sources of information into one expected return formula. The first source of information is the expected returns that follow from the Capital Asset Pricing Model and thus should hold if the market is in equilibrium. The second source of information is comprised of the views held by investors. The presented extension, owing to the use of fuzzy random variables, includes two elements that are important from the point of view of practice: linguistic information and the views of multiple experts. The paper introduces the model extension step-by-step and presents an empirical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept of FRV was introduced by Feron, R., 1976. Ensembles aleatoires flous. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. A (282), pp. 903–906.

  2. 2.

    Variance of FRV have several definition of variance (cf. [6]).

  3. 3.

    The aggregation operator can be considered as a separate research issue. This paper illustrates a new BL algorithm; so, vector p is set in the simplest way through the frequency of the experts answers, with the assumption that all the opinions are equivalent.

  4. 4.

    The WIG20 index is based on the value of a portfolio with shares in the 20 major and most liquid companies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange Main List.

References

  1. Bevan A, Winkelmann K (1998) Using the Black-Litterman global asset allocation model: three years of practical experience, Goldman, Sachs & Company

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black F (1972) Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. J Bus 45(3):444–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Black F, Litterman R (1990) Asset allocation: combining investors views with market equilibrium. Fixed Income Research, Goldman, Sachs & Company

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black F, Litterman R (1991) Global asset allocation with equities, bonds and currencies, Goldman, Sachs & Company

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black F, Litterman R (1992) Global portfolio optimization. Financ Anal J, 28–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Couso I, Dubois D (2009) On the variability of the concept of variance for fuzzy random variables. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 5(17):1070–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng Y, Hu L, Shu H (2001) The variance and covariance of fuzzy random variables and their applications. Fuzzy Sets Syst 120:487–497

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gharakhani M, Sadjadi S (2013) A fuzzy compromise programming approach for the Black-Litterman portfolio selection model. Decis Sci Lett 1(2):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gil M, Lopex-Diz M, Ralescu D (2006) Overview on the development of fuzzy random variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:2546–2557

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. He G, Litterman R (1999) The intuition behind Black-Litterman model portfolios, Goldman, Sachs & Company

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huynh V-N, Nakamori Y (2005) Multi-expert decision-making with linguistic information: a probabilistic-based model. IEEE, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kacprzyk J, Orlovski S (2013) Optimization models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Springer, Netherlands

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Krätschmer V (2001) A unified approach to fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 123:1–9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruse R, Meyer KD (1987) Statistic with vague data. Reidel Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwakernaak H (1989) Fuzzy random variables. definition and theorems. Inf Sci 15:1–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawrence K, Pai DR, Klimberg RK, Lawrence SM (2009) A fuzzy programming approach to financial portfolio model. Financial Modeling Applications and Data Envelopment Applications 53

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):12–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Litterman R, the Quantitative Resources Group (2003) Modern investment management: an equilibrium approach. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  19. Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meucci A (2008) The Black-Litterman approach: original model and extensions. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1117574

  21. Noor-E-Alama M, Ferdousi Lipi T, Ahsan Akhtar Hasin M, Ullah A (2011) Algorithms for fuzzy multi expert multi criteria decision making (ME-MCDM). Knowledge-Based Systems, April, 367–377

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puri ML (1986) Fuzzy random variables. J Math Anal Appl 114:409–422

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Polish National Science Center under Grant 2013/09/N/HS4/03761.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Rutkowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bartkowiak, M., Rutkowska, A. (2017). Black-Litterman Model with Multiple Experts’ Linguistic Views. In: Ferraro, M., et al. Soft Methods for Data Science. SMPS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42971-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42972-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics