Skip to main content

Handling Uncertainty in Structural Equation Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 456))

Abstract

This paper attempts to propose an overview of a recent method named partial possibilistic regression path modeling (PPRPM), which is a particular structural equation model that combines the principles of path modeling with those of possibilistic regression to model the net of relations among variables. PPRPM assumes that the randomness can be referred to the measurement error, that is the error in modeling the relations among the observed variables, and the vagueness to the structural error, that is the uncertainty in modeling the relations among the latent variables behind each block. PPRPM gives rise to possibilistic regressions that account for the imprecise nature or vagueness in our understanding phenomena, which is manifested by yielding interval path coefficients of the structural model. However, possibilistic regression is known to be a model sensitive to extreme values. That is way recent developments of PPRPM are focused on robust procedures for the detection of extreme values to omit or lessen their effect on the modeling. A case study on the motivational and emotional aspects of teaching is used to illustrate the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alefeld G, Mayer G (2000) Interval analysis: theory and applications. J Comput Appl Math 121:421–464

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Billard L, Diday E (2000) Regression analysis for interval-valued data. In: Data analysis, classification, and related methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 369–374

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco-Fernndez A, Corral N, Gonzguez G, (2011) Estimation of a flexible simple linear model for interval data based on set arithmetic. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(9):2568–2578

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bollen K (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Coppi R, D’Urso P, Giordani P, Santoro A (2006) Least squares estimation of a linear regression model with LR fuzzy. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:267–286

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Coppi R (2008) Management of uncertainty in statistical reasoning: the case of regression analysis. Int J Approximate Reasoning 47:284–305

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond P (1988) Fuzzy least squares. Inf Sci 46:141–157

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond P (1990) Least squares fitting of compact set-valued data. J Math Anal Appl 147:531–544

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima Neto EA, de Carvalho FAT (2010) Constrained linear regression models for symbolic interval-valued variables. Comput Stat Data Anal 54:333–347

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Loehlin JC (2004) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Erlbaum, Hillside

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Löhmoller J (1989) Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica-Verlag, Heildelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Marino M, Palumbo F (2002) Interval arithmetic for the evaluation of imprecise data effects in least squares linear regression. Statistica Applicata (Ital J Appl Stat) 14:277–291

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moé A, Pazzaglia F, Friso G (2010) MESI. Motivazioni, emozioni, strategie e insegnamento. Questionari metacognitivi per insegnanti. Edizioni Erickson

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romano R, Palumbo F (2013) Partial possibilistic regression path modeling for subjective measurement. J Methodol Appl Stat 15:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  15. Romano R, Palumbo F (2016) Partial possibilistic regression path modeling. In: Abdi et al. (eds) The multiple facets of partial least squares methods, Springer proceedings in mathematics and statistics. Springer, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Romano R, Palumbo F (2016) Comparing partial least squares and partial possibilistic regression path modeling to likert type scales: results from a montecarlo simulation study. IFCS 2016 Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shakouri G, Nadimi R (2013) Outlier detection in fuzzy linear regression with crisp input-output by linguistic variable view. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):734–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka H, Asai K (1982) Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12:903–907

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka H, Guo P (1999) Possibilistic data analysis for operations research. Physica-Verlag, Wurzburg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka H, Watada J (1987) Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model. Fuzzy Sets Syst 27:275–289

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Vilares MJ, Almeida MH, Coelho PS (2010) Comparison of likelihood and PLS estimators for structural equation modeling: a simulation with customer satisfaction data. Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wold H (1966) Estimation of principal component and related models by iterative least squares. In: Krishnaiah P (ed) Analysis multivariate. Academic Press, New York, pp 391–420

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosaria Romano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Romano, R., Palumbo, F. (2017). Handling Uncertainty in Structural Equation Modeling. In: Ferraro, M., et al. Soft Methods for Data Science. SMPS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42971-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42972-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics