Skip to main content

Proof Pearl: Bounding Least Common Multiples with Triangles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9807))

Abstract

We present a proof of the fact that \(2^{n} \le {{\mathrm{lcm}}}\{1, 2, 3, \dots , (n+1)\}\). This result has a standard proof via an integral, but our proof is purely number theoretic, requiring little more than list inductions. The proof is based on manipulations of a variant of Leibniz’s Harmonic Triangle, itself a relative of Pascal’s better-known Triangle.

NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Communications and the Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence Program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use here since we allow .

  2. 2.

    This is illustrated in Fig. 2 from the middle (step 4) to the last (step 7).

References

  1. Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: PRIMES is in P. Ann. Math. 160(2), 781–793 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayoub, A.B.: The harmonic triangle and the beta function. Math. Mag. 60(4), 223–225 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bicknell-Johnson, M.: Diagonal sums in the harmonic triangle. Fibonacci Q. 19(3), 196–199 (1981)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, H.-L., Norrish, M.: Mechanisation of AKS algorithm: Part 1–the main theorem. In: Urban, C., Zhang, X. (eds.) ITP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9236, pp. 117–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esteve, M.R.M., Delshams, A.: Euler’s beta function in Pietro Mengoli’s works. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 63(3), 325–356 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Farhi, B.: An identity involving the least common multiple of binomial coefficients and its application. Am. Math. Mon. 116(9), 836–839 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy, G.H., Wright, E.M.: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, USA (2008). ISBN: 9780199219865

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, S.: Nair’s and Farhi’s identities involving the least common multiple of binomial coefficients are equivalent, July 2009. http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.3401

  9. Grigory, M.: Answer to: is there a direct proof of this LCM identity? Question 1442 on Math Stack Exchange, August 2010. http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1442/

  10. Nair, M.: On Chebyshev-type inequalities for primes. Am. Math. Mon. 89(2), 126–129 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hing-Lun Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chan, HL., Norrish, M. (2016). Proof Pearl: Bounding Least Common Multiples with Triangles. In: Blanchette, J., Merz, S. (eds) Interactive Theorem Proving. ITP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43144-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43144-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43143-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43144-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics