Abstract
Data has become an important economic good. This has led to the development of data marketplaces which facilitate trading by bringing data vendors and data consumers together on one platform. Despite the existence of such infrastructures, data vendors struggle to determine the value their offerings have to customers. This paper explores a novel pricing scheme that allows for price discrimination of customers by selling custom-tailored variants of a data product at a price suggested by a customer. To this end, data quality is adjusted to meet a customer’s willingness to pay. To balance customer preferences and vendor interest, a model is developed, translating fair pricing into a Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem and making it amenable to an algorithmic solution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
\({m_l}_i\) is used to indicate that depending on whether \(q_i \in \mathsf {V}\) or \(q_i \in \mathsf {G}\), \({m_l}^{\mathsf {G}}\) or \({m_l}^{\mathsf {V}}\) has to be substituted.
References
Balazinska, M., Howe, B., Koutris, P., Suciu, D., Upadhyaya, P.: A discussion on pricing relational data. In: Tannen, V., Wong, L., Libkin, L., Fan, W., Tan, W.-C., Fourman, M. (eds.) Buneman festschrift 2013. LNCS, vol. 8000, pp. 167–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Balazinska, M., et al.: Data markets in the cloud: an opportunity for the database community. PVLDB 4(12), 1482–1485 (2011)
Batini, C., et al.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Dudziński, K., et al.: Exact methods for the knapsack problem and its generalizations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28(1), 3–21 (1987)
Dyer, M., et al.: A branch and bound algorithm for solving the multiple-choice knapsack problem. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 11(2), 231–249 (1984)
Dyer, M., et al.: A hybrid dynamic programming/branch-and-bound algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 58(1), 43–54 (1995)
Garcia-Molina, H., et al.: Database Systems: The Complete Book. Pearson Education Limited, Upper Saddle River (2013)
Garey, M.R., et al.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)
Gens, G., et al.: An approximate binary search algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 67(5), 261–265 (1998)
Ibaraki, T., et al.: The multiple choice knapsack problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn. 21, 59–94 (1978)
Kellerer, H., et al.: Knapsack Problems. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Koutris, P., et al.: Toward practical query pricing with QueryMarket. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 613–624 (2013)
Lawler, E.L.: Fast approximation algorithmsfor knapsack problems. In: 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 206–213 (1977)
Maier, D., et al.: On the foundations of the universal relation model. ACM TODS 9(2), 283–308 (1984)
Muschalle, A., Stahl, F., Löser, A., Vossen, G.: Pricing approaches for data markets. In: Castellanos, M., Dayal, U., Rundensteiner, E.A. (eds.) BIRTE 2012. LNBIP, vol. 154, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Narahari, Y., et al.: Dynamic pricing models forelectronic business. Sadhana (Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci.) 30(2 & 3), 231–256 (2005). Indian Academy of Sciences
Naumann, F.: Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems. LNCS, vol. 2261. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Pindyck, R.S., et al.: Mikroökonomie. 8. überarbeitete Auflage. Pearson Deutschland GmbH, München (2013)
Pisinger, D.: A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83(2), 394–410 (1995)
Shapiro, C., et al.: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Strategy/Technology/Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)
Stahl, F.: High-Quality Web Information Provisioning and Quality-Based Data Pricing. Ph.D. thesis. University of Münster (2015)
Stahl, F., Vossen, G.: Data quality scores for pricing on data marketplaces. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawinńki, B., Fujita, H., Hong, T.-P. (eds.) ACIIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9621, pp. 215–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
Tang, R., Amarilli, A., Senellart, P., Bressan, S.: Get a sample for a discount. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Spies, M., Wagner, R.R. (eds.) DEXA 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8644, pp. 20–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Tang, R., Shao, D., Bressan, S., Valduriez, P.: What you pay for is what you get. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Basl, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) DEXA 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8056, pp. 395–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stahl, F., Vossen, G. (2016). Fair Knapsack Pricing for Data Marketplaces. In: Pokorný, J., Ivanović, M., Thalheim, B., Šaloun, P. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44039-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44039-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44038-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44039-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)