Skip to main content

Method to Establish Strategies for Implementing Process Improvement According to the Organization’s Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 633))

Abstract

Software process improvement has become a logical way to address the growing need of increasing the competitiveness in software development organizations. Unfortunately, not all process improvement implementations have the desired results, because the existing models and standards focus their attention on “which activities to implement” without addressing “how to implement them”. However, identifying which are the activities to implement is not enough; the knowledge of how to implement them is required for a successful implementation of software process improvement initiatives. This paper shows a method that provides strategies for the implementation of software process improvements based on the contextual aspects in which the software is developed, so that, the strategy is provided according to the organization needs and their work culture regarding project management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI for Development: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Pearson Education Inc., Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 15504: 2004 Information technology – Process assessment (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oktaba H., Vázquez A.: MoProSoft: a software process model for small enterprises. In: Software Process Improvement for Small and Medium Enterprises, Techniques and cases studies, (Information Science Reference), p. 170 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laporte, C.Y., Alexandre, S., O’Connor, R.V.: A software engineering lifecycle standard for very small enterprises. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2008. CCIS, vol. 16, pp. 129–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korsaa, M., Johansen, J., Schweiger, T., Vohwinke, D., Messnarz, R., Nevalainen, R., Biro, M.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw. Evol. Process 25, 381–391 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Connor, R., Basri, S.: The effect of team dynamics on software development process improvement. Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof. 3, 13–26 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pressman, R.: Ingenieria del Software Un enfoque práctico. Mc Graw Hill, Madrid (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Regan, G.: Introduction to Software Process Improvement. Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science. Springer, London (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Gasca-Hurtado, G.P., Valtierra, C., Duron, B.: Covering the human perspective in software process improvement. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 123–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuevas A., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., García, I.: Some key topics to be considered in agile estimation techniques and innovative approach to software process improvement. In: Colomo-Palacios, R., et al. (eds.) IGI Global, pp. 119–142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niazi, M., et al.: A framework for assisting the design of effective software process improvement implementation strategies. J. Syst. Softw. 78(2), 204–222 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alagarsamy, K., et al.: Implementation specification for software process improvement supportive knowledge management tool. Softw. IET 2(2), 123–133 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexandre, S., et al.: OWPL: A gradual approach for software process improvement in SMEs. In: 32nd Conference on EUROMICRO, Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galinac, T.: Empirical evaluation of selected best practices in implementation of software process improvement. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(9), 1351–1364 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niazi, M., et al.: A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study. J. Syst. Softw. 74(2), 155–172 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Montoni, M.A., Rocha, A.R.: Applying grounded theory to understand software process improvement implementation. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Asato, R., et al.: Alignment between the business strategy and the software processes improvement: a roadmap for the implementation. In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, PICMET 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karlstrom, D., et al.: Aggregating viewpoints for strategic software process improvement-a method and a case study. IEE Proc. Softw. 149(5), 143–152 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pettersson, F., et al.: A practitione’s guide to light weight software process assessment and improvement planning. J. Syst. Softw. 81(6), 972–995 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pino, F.J., García, F., Piattini, M.: An sintegrated framework to guide software process improvement in small organization. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Cuadrago Gallego, J., Rejas Muslera, R., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2009. CCIS, vol. 42, pp. 213–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Diana, K., M. Stephen, A.: Systems approach to software process improvement in small organizations. In: Industrial Proceedings of EuroSPI 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., Gómez, G., Mejia, J., Muñoz, M., San Feliu, T.: Methodology for process improvement through basic components and focusing on the resistance to change. J. Softw. Evol. Process 24(5), 511–523 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hauck, J., et al.: Process reference guides– support for improving software processes in alignment with reference models and standards. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2008. CCIS, vol. 16, pp. 70–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Landaeta, J., et al.: Practical SPI planning. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2008. CCIS, vol. 16, pp. 82–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Bayona, S., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San Feliu, T.: MEDEPRO: a method to deploy processes focused on people. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ayanwale, A.M., Georgiadou, E.: IDIEF - an integrated framework for software process and product improvement in SMEs. In: EuroSPI 2012 Industrial Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ogasawara, H., et al.: Proposal and practice of SPI framework - Toshiba´s SPI history since 2000. In: EuroSPI 2012 Industrial Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martins, P.V., da Silva, A.R.: ProPAMet: a Metric for process and project alignment. In: O’Connor, R., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2008. CCIS, vol. 16, pp. 201–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Aysolmaz, B., Demirörs, O.: A detailed software process improvement methodology: BG-SPI. In: O’Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 97–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan, X., et al.: Research on organizational-level software process improvement model and its implementation. In: International Symposium on Computer Science and Computational Technology, ISCSCT 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valdés, G., Visconti, M., Astudillo, H.: The tutelkan reference process: a reusable process model for enabling SPI in small settings. In: O’Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 179–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Wieringa, R.J.: “Observational Case Studies” in Desing Science Methodology for information Systems and Software Engineering, pp. 225–245. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014). (eBook). ISBN 978-3-662-43839-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirna Muñoz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., Gasca Hurtado, G.P., Gómez-Álvarez, M.C., Durón, B. (2016). Method to Establish Strategies for Implementing Process Improvement According to the Organization’s Context. In: Kreiner, C., O'Connor, R., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44816-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44817-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics