Skip to main content

An Approach to Subjectivity Detection on Twitter Using the Structured Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9875))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an approach to the subjectivity detection on Twitter micro texts that explores the uses of the structured information of the social network framework. The sentiment analysis on Twitter has been usually performed through the automatic processing of the texts. However, the established limit of 140 characters and the particular characteristics of the texts reduce drastically the accuracy of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Under these circumstances, it becomes necessary to study new data sources that allow us to extract new useful knowledge to represent and classify the texts. The structured information, also called meta-information or meta-data, provide us with alternative features of the texts that can improve the classification tasks. In this study we have analysed the use of features extracted from the structured information in the subjectivity detection task, as a first step of the polarity detection task, and their integration with classical features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.sepln.org/.

  2. 2.

    Workshop on Sentiment Analysis at SEPLN Conference.

References

  1. Alonso, M.A., Vilares, D.: A review on political analysis and social media. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Nat. 56, 13–24 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbosa, L., Feng, J.: Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 36–44 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belkaroui, R., Faiz, R.: Towards events tweet contextualization using social influence model and users conversations. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, p. 3. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.F.: On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cotelo, J.M., Cruz, F., Ortega, F.J., Troyano, J.A.: Explorando Twitter mediante la integracin de informacin estructurada y no estructurada. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Nat. 55, 75–82 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Choudhury, M., Gamon, M., Counts, S., Horvitz, E.: Predicting depression via social media. In: ICWSM, p. 2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esparza, S.G., OMahony, M.P., Smyth, B.: Mining the real-time web: a novel approach to product recommendation. Knowl. Based Syst. 29, 3–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, B., Cook, P., Baldwin, T.: unimelb: Spanish text normalisation. In: Tweet-Norm@ SEPLN, pp. 32–36 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, Z.S.: Distributional structure. Word 10(2–3), 146–162 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeni, L.A., Cohn, J.F., De La Torre, F.: Facing imbalanced data-recommendations for the use of performance metrics. In: 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 245–251. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu, X., Zhao, T.: Target-dependent Twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 151–160 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 5(1), 1–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, B., Zhang, L.: A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Aggarwal, C.C., Zhai, C.X. (eds.) Mining Text Data, pp. 415–463. Springer, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Martínez-Cámara, E., Martín-Valdivia, M.T., Ureña-López, L.A., Montejo-Ráez, A.R.: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. Nat. Lang. Eng. 20(01), 1–28 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Medhat, W., Hassan, A., Korashy, H.: Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: a survey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5(4), 1093–1113 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mejova, Y., Srinivasan, P., Boynton, B.: GOP primary season on Twitter: popular political sentiment in social media. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.Y., Onnela, J.P., Rosenquist, J.N.: Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. ICWSM 11, 5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Monti, C., Rozza, A., Zapella, G., Zignani, M., Arvidsson, A., Colleoni, E.: Modelling political disaffection from Twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining (WISDOM 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: A machine learning approach to Twitter user classification. ICWSM 11(1), 281–288 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Porta, J., Sancho, J.L.: Word normalization in Twitter using finite-state transducers. In: Tweet-Norm@ SEPLN, vol. 1086, pp. 49–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, C.: DMR Twitter Statistic Report. Last modified 26 Feb 2016. http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/downloads/twitter-statistic-report/. Accessed 28 Mar 2016

  25. Ting, K.M., Witten, I.H.: Issues in stacked generalization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 10, 271–289 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Villena-Román, J., García-Morera, J., García-Cumbreras, M.A., Martínez-Cámara, E., Martín-Valdivia, M.T., Ureã-López, L.A.: Overview of TASS 2015. In: Proceedings of TASS 2015: Workshop on Sentiment Analysis at SEPLN, vol. 1397. CEUR-WS.org (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Volkova, S., Wilson, T., Yarowsky, D.: Exploring demographic language variations to improve multilingual sentiment analysis in social media. In: EMNLP, pp. 1815–1827 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5(2), 241–259 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Sixto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sixto, J., Almeida, A., López-de-Ipiña, D. (2016). An Approach to Subjectivity Detection on Twitter Using the Structured Information. In: Nguyen, NT., Iliadis, L., Manolopoulos, Y., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9875. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45243-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45243-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45242-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45243-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics