Skip to main content

Focusing Business Improvements Using Process Mining Based Influence Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 260))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business processes are traditionally regarded as generalized abstractions describing the activities and common behaviour of a large group of process instances. However, the recent developments in process mining and data analysis show that individual process instances may behave very different from each other. In this paper we present a generic methodology called influence analysis for finding business improvement areas related to business processes. Influence analysis is based on process mining, root cause analysis and classification rule mining. We present three generic target levels for business improvements and define corresponding probability-based interestingness measures. We then define measures for reporting the contribution results to business people and show how these measures can be used to focus improvements. Real-life case study is also included to show the methodology in action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersen, B., Fagerhaug, T.: Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bay, S., Pazzani, M.: Detecting group differences: mining contrast sets. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 5(3), 213–246 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general framework for correlating business process characteristics. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 250–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.J.: Interestingness measures for data mining: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 38(3), 9 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldratt, E.M.: Theory of Constraints. North River, Croton-on-Hudson (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holte, R.C.: Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Mach. Learn. 11(1), 63–90 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Inmon, W.H.: Building the Data Warehouse. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Abductive logic programming. J. Logic Comput. 2(6), 719–770 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer-Schnberger, V., Cukier, K.: Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, vol. 29. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.: Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. In: Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 229–248 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. QPR Software Plc.: QPR Software to Offer Business Process optimization with Automated Business Process Discovery Software QPR Process Analyzer, Press release 15 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision Mining in ProM. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Suriadi, S., Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Root cause analysis with enriched process logs. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 174–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.: Causal nets: a modeling language tailored towards process discovery. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 28–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Dongen, B.F.: BPI Challenge 2014. Rabobank Nederland. Dataset (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.4121/uuid:c3e5d162-0cfd-4bb0-bd82-af5268819c35

  19. Webb, G.I., Butler, S., Newlands, D.: On detecting differences between groups. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank QPR Software Plc for the practical experiences from a wide variety of customer cases and for funding our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teemu Lehto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lehto, T., Hinkka, M., Hollmén, J. (2016). Focusing Business Improvements Using Process Mining Based Influence Analysis. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics