Skip to main content

Use of Piecewise Linear and Nonlinear Scalarizing Functions in MOEA/D

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9921))

Abstract

A number of weight vector-based algorithms have been proposed for many-objective optimization using the framework of MOEA/D (multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition). Those algorithms are characterized by the use of uniformly distributed normalized weight vectors, which are also referred to as reference vectors, reference lines and search directions. Their common idea is to minimize the distance to the ideal point (i.e., convergence) and the distance to the reference line (i.e., uniformity). Each algorithm has its own mechanism for striking a convergence-uniformity balance. In the original MOEA/D with the PBI (penalty-based boundary intersection) function, this balance is handled by a penalty parameter. In this paper, we first discuss why an appropriate specification of the penalty parameter is difficult. Next we suggest a desired shape of contour lines of a scalarizing function in MOEA/D. Then we propose two ideas for modifying the PBI function. The proposed ideas generate piecewise linear and nonlinear contour lines. Finally we examine the effectiveness of the proposed ideas on the performance of MOEA/D for many-objective test problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asafuddoula, M., Ray, T., Sarker, R.: A decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm for many objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19, 445–460 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. (in press). doi:10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519378

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based non-dominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 577–601 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In: Proceedings of IEEE CEC 2002, pp. 825–830

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, L.: A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10, 477–506 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishibuchi, H., Akedo, N., Nojima, Y.: Behavior of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms on many-objective knapsack problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19, 264–283 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibuchi, H., Doi, K., Nojima, Y.: Characteristics of many-objective test problems and penalty parameter specification in MOEA/D. In: Proceedings of IEEE CEC 2016, pp. 1115–1122 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a short review. In: Proceedings of IEEE CEC 2008, pp. 2424–2431 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, B., Li, J., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Many-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 48(1), 13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm based on dominance and decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19, 694–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, R., Zhang, Q., Zhang, T.: Decomposition based algorithms using pareto adaptive scalarizing methods. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. (in press). 10.1109/TEVC.2016.2521175

  13. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11, 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3, 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisao Ishibuchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ishibuchi, H., Doi, K., Nojima, Y. (2016). Use of Piecewise Linear and Nonlinear Scalarizing Functions in MOEA/D. In: Handl, J., Hart, E., Lewis, P., López-Ibáñez, M., Ochoa, G., Paechter, B. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV. PPSN 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9921. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45823-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics