Skip to main content

Graceful Scaling on Uniform Versus Steep-Tailed Noise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV (PPSN 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9921))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, different evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been analyzed in noisy environments. The most frequently used noise model for this was additive posterior noise (noise added after the fitness evaluation) taken from a Gaussian distribution. In particular, for this setting it was shown that the \((\mu +1)\)-EA on OneMax does not scale gracefully (higher noise cannot efficiently be compensated by higher \(\mu \)).

In this paper we want to understand whether there is anything special about the Gaussian distribution which makes the \((\mu +1)\)-EA not scale gracefully. We keep the setting of posterior noise, but we look at other distributions. We see that for exponential tails the \((\mu +1)\)-EA on OneMax does also not scale gracefully, for similar reasons as in the case of Gaussian noise. On the other hand, for uniform distributions (as well as other, similar distributions) we see that the \((\mu +1)\)-EA on OneMax does scale gracefully, indicating the importance of the noise model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bianchi, L., Dorigo, M., Gambardella, L., Gutjahr, W.: A survey on metaheuristics for stochastic combinatorial optimization. Nat. Comput. 8, 239–287 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dang, D.-C., Lehre, P.K.: Evolution under partial information. In: Proceedings of GECCO 2014, pp. 1359–1366 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doerr, B., Hota, A., Kötzing, T.: Ants easily solve stochastic shortest path problems. In: Proceedings of GECCO 2012, pp. 17–24 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doerr, B., Johannsen, D., Winzen, C.: Multiplicative drift analysis. Algorithmica 64(4), 673–697 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldmann, M., Kötzing, T.: Optimizing expected path lengths with ant colony optimization using fitness proportional update. In: Proceedings of FOGA 2013, pp. 65–74 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedrich, T., Kötzing, T., Krejca, M.S., Sutton, A.M.: The benefit of recombination in noisy evolutionary search. In: Elbassioni, K., Makino, K. (eds.) ISAAC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9472, pp. 140–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48971-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gießen, C., Kötzing, T.: Robustness of populations in stochastic environments. In: Proceedings of GECCO 2014, pp. 1383–1390 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutjahr, W.J.: A converging ACO algorithm for stochastic combinatorial optimization. In: Albrecht, A.A., Steinhöfel, K. (eds.) SAGA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2827, pp. 10–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutjahr, W., Pflug, G.: Simulated annealing for noisy cost functions. J. Glob. Optim. 8, 1–13 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin, Y., Branke, J.: Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments–a survey. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 9, 303–317 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehre, P.K.: Negative drift in populations. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN XI. LNCS, vol. 6238, pp. 244–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prügel-Bennett, A., Rowe, J.E., Shapiro, J.: Run-time analysis of population-based evolutionary algorithm in noisy environments. In: Proceedings of FOGA 2015, pp. 69–75 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sudholt, D., Thyssen, C.: A simple ant colony optimizer for stochastic shortest path problems. Algorithmica 64, 643–672 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Witt, C.: Runtime analysis of the \((\mu + 1)\) EA on simple pseudo-boolean functions. Evol. Comput. 14, 65–86 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 618091 (SAGE) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grant agreement no. FR 2988 (TOSU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin S. Krejca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Friedrich, T., Kötzing, T., Krejca, M.S., Sutton, A.M. (2016). Graceful Scaling on Uniform Versus Steep-Tailed Noise. In: Handl, J., Hart, E., Lewis, P., López-Ibáñez, M., Ochoa, G., Paechter, B. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV. PPSN 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9921. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45823-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics