Skip to main content

Debate About the Concept of Value in Commons-Based Peer Production

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet Science (INSCI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9934))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe a new model of collaborative production called Commons-based peer production (CBPP). This model is frequently supported by digital platforms characterized by peer to peer relationships, resulting in the provision of common resources. Traditionally, it is associated with cases such as Wikipedia or Free Software, but we have recently observed an expansion into other areas. On the basis of an extensive empirical work, we enquired -How does CBPP apply value? and How does value creation function in CBPP? We present an updated version of the meaning of value and sustain the relevance of this debate. After that, we propose how to measure value. We formulate what we call internal and external indicators of value. The first are linked to the internal performance of the CBPP and the second relates to its social value and reputation. Finally we highlight the main features of value that we identified and discuss the limits that we found developing and implementing the proposed diversity indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When building our conceptual framework, we also identified a sixth dimension, which we called Ecological value. However, according to our understanding, this dimension could be quite distinctive and crucial in grasping value within CBPP. We could not find any feasible indicator to operationalize it.

  2. 2.

    https://goo.gl/WcGhCi Codebook (23/03/2016).

  3. 3.

    ** => 0.005 and * => 0.05.

References

  1. Adler, P.S., Heckscher, C.: Towards collaborative community. In: The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy, pp. 11–105 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arthur, W.B.: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Arvidsson, A.: Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. Psychology Press, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Arvidsson, A., Peitersen, N.: The Ethical Economy: Rebuilding Value After the Crisis. Columbia University Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbrook, R.: The hi-tech gift economy. First Monday 3(12) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauwens, M.: Peer to peer and human evolution. Integr. Vis. 15 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benkler, Y.: Coase’s penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”. Yale Law J. 112, 369–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morell, M.F.: Theoretical synthesis: final theoretical synthesis of WP1, including research reports on data collection. Technical Report #WP1. European Commission (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh, R.A.: Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the internet. First Monday 3(2) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(3), 424–440 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kelty, C.: Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, Duke (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelty, C.M.: Participation. In: Peters, P. (ed.) Digital Keywords. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: El diseño de la investigación social: la inferencia científica en los estudios cualitativos. Alianza Editorial, Madrid (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muegge, S.: Platforms, communities, and business ecosystems: lessons learned about technology entrepreneurship in an interconnected world. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 3(2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Munda, G.: Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23(1), 86–94 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neil, M.: Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes. Pluto Press, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge Univ Pr., Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Park, H.W., Thelwall, M.: The network approach to web hyperlink research and its utility for science communication. In: Hine, C. (ed.) Virtual Methods Issues in Social Research on the Internet, pp. 171–183. Berg, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peck, J.: Struggling with the creative class. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 29(4), 740–770 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poteete, A.R., Janssen, M., Ostrom, E.: Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Raymond, E.: The Cathedral & the Bazaar (Revised.). Paperback. O’Reilly Media (2001). Accedido desde. http://biblioweb.sindominio.net/telematica/catedral.html

  24. Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. für Betriebswirtschaft 55(1), 63–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., de Laat, M.: Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework (2011). http://www.knowledge-architecture.com/downloads/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Framework programme FP7-ICT-2013-10 of the European Commission, through project P2Pvalue (www.p2pvalue.eu) (grant no.: 610961).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayo Fuster Morell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morell, M.F., Salcedo, J.L., Berlinguer, M. (2016). Debate About the Concept of Value in Commons-Based Peer Production. In: Bagnoli, F., et al. Internet Science. INSCI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9934. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45981-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45982-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics