Abstract
We describe a new model of collaborative production called Commons-based peer production (CBPP). This model is frequently supported by digital platforms characterized by peer to peer relationships, resulting in the provision of common resources. Traditionally, it is associated with cases such as Wikipedia or Free Software, but we have recently observed an expansion into other areas. On the basis of an extensive empirical work, we enquired -How does CBPP apply value? and How does value creation function in CBPP? We present an updated version of the meaning of value and sustain the relevance of this debate. After that, we propose how to measure value. We formulate what we call internal and external indicators of value. The first are linked to the internal performance of the CBPP and the second relates to its social value and reputation. Finally we highlight the main features of value that we identified and discuss the limits that we found developing and implementing the proposed diversity indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
When building our conceptual framework, we also identified a sixth dimension, which we called Ecological value. However, according to our understanding, this dimension could be quite distinctive and crucial in grasping value within CBPP. We could not find any feasible indicator to operationalize it.
- 2.
https://goo.gl/WcGhCi Codebook (23/03/2016).
- 3.
** => 0.005 and * => 0.05.
References
Adler, P.S., Heckscher, C.: Towards collaborative community. In: The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy, pp. 11–105 (2006)
Arthur, W.B.: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)
Arvidsson, A.: Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. Psychology Press, New York (2006)
Arvidsson, A., Peitersen, N.: The Ethical Economy: Rebuilding Value After the Crisis. Columbia University Press, New York (2013)
Barbrook, R.: The hi-tech gift economy. First Monday 3(12) (1998)
Bauwens, M.: Peer to peer and human evolution. Integr. Vis. 15 (2005)
Benkler, Y.: Coase’s penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”. Yale Law J. 112, 369–446 (2002)
Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)
Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (2002)
Morell, M.F.: Theoretical synthesis: final theoretical synthesis of WP1, including research reports on data collection. Technical Report #WP1. European Commission (2014)
Ghosh, R.A.: Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the internet. First Monday 3(2) (1998)
Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(3), 424–440 (1985)
Kelty, C.: Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, Duke (2008)
Kelty, C.M.: Participation. In: Peters, P. (ed.) Digital Keywords. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)
King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: El diseño de la investigación social: la inferencia científica en los estudios cualitativos. Alianza Editorial, Madrid (2000)
Muegge, S.: Platforms, communities, and business ecosystems: lessons learned about technology entrepreneurship in an interconnected world. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 3(2) (2013)
Munda, G.: Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23(1), 86–94 (2006)
O’Neil, M.: Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes. Pluto Press, London (2009)
Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge Univ Pr., Cambridge (1991)
Park, H.W., Thelwall, M.: The network approach to web hyperlink research and its utility for science communication. In: Hine, C. (ed.) Virtual Methods Issues in Social Research on the Internet, pp. 171–183. Berg, Oxford (2005)
Peck, J.: Struggling with the creative class. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 29(4), 740–770 (2005)
Poteete, A.R., Janssen, M., Ostrom, E.: Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)
Raymond, E.: The Cathedral & the Bazaar (Revised.). Paperback. O’Reilly Media (2001). Accedido desde. http://biblioweb.sindominio.net/telematica/catedral.html
Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. für Betriebswirtschaft 55(1), 63–78 (2005)
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., de Laat, M.: Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework (2011). http://www.knowledge-architecture.com/downloads/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Framework programme FP7-ICT-2013-10 of the European Commission, through project P2Pvalue (www.p2pvalue.eu) (grant no.: 610961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morell, M.F., Salcedo, J.L., Berlinguer, M. (2016). Debate About the Concept of Value in Commons-Based Peer Production. In: Bagnoli, F., et al. Internet Science. INSCI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9934. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45981-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45982-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)