Skip to main content

Can Goal Reasoning Techniques Be Used for Strategic Decision-Making?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9974))

Abstract

Business strategies aim to operationalize an enterprise’s mission and visions by defining initiatives and choosing among alternative courses of action through some form of strategic analysis. However, existing analysis techniques (e.g., SWOT analysis, Five Forces Model) are invariably informal and sketchy, in sharp contrast to the formal and algorithmic counterparts developed in Conceptual Modeling and Software Engineering. Among such techniques, goal models and goal reasoning have become very prominent over the past twenty years, helping to model stakeholder requirements and the alternative ways these can be fulfilled. In this work we explore the applicability of goal models to conceptualize strategic business problems and capture viable alternatives in support of formal strategic decision-making. We show through a comparative study how analysis can be conducted on a realistic case adopted from the literature using existing goal modeling techniques, and identify their weaknesses and limitations that need to be addressed in order to accommodate strategic business analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Find the complete model at http://disi.unitn.it/~paja/pdf/rccl-diagrams.pdf.

  2. 2.

    See http://disi.unitn.it/~paja/pdf/rccl-diagrams.pdf for the complete model.

References

  1. Amyot, D., Ghanavati, S., Horkoff, J., Mussbacher, G., Peyton, L., Yu, E.: Evaluating goal models within the goal-oriented requirement language. In: IJIS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blythe, J.: Principles & Practice of Marketing. Cengage Learning EMEA, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll, P., Mui, C., Lessons, B.D.: What You Can Learn from the Most Inexcusable Business Failures of the Last Twenty-five Years. Penguin, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20(1–2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dealtry, R.: ‘Dynamic SWOT Analysis’: Developer’s Guide. IP (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenhardt, K.M., Zbaracki, M.J.: Strategic decision making. SMJ 13, 17 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greco, S.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, vol. 78. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Sebastiani, R.: Goal-oriented requirements analysis and reasoning in the tropos methodology. EAAI 18(2), 159–171 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Handfield, R., Walton, S.V., Sroufe, R., Melnyk, S.A.: Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(1), 70–87 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Horkoff, J., Barone, D., Jiang, L., Yu, E., Amyot, D., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Strategic business modeling: representation and reasoning. SSM 13, 1015–1041 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Analyzing goal models: different approaches and how to choose among them. In: ACM SAC, pp. 675–682. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Comparison and evaluation of goal-oriented satisfaction analysis techniques. REJ 18(3), 199–222 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Interactive goal model analysis for early requirements engineering. In: REJ, pp. 1–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Performance measurement, management, and appraisal sourcebook, vol. 66 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Letier, E., Stefan, D., Barr, E.T.: Uncertainty, risk, and information value in software requirements and architecture. In: ICSE, pp. 883–894. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liaskos, S., McIlraith, S.A., Sohrabi, S., Mylopoulos, J.: Integrating preferences into goal models for requirements engineering. In: RE, pp. 135–144 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McFarlan, F.W., Massoni, V.: Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. HBS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Object Management Group. Business Motivation Model v1.3 specification (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Porter, M.E.: Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competition, vol. 300. Free Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porter, M.E.: The five competitive forces that shape strategy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, R.: Economic evaluation and health care: cost-benefit analysis. Br. Med. J. 307, 924–924 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shyur, H.J., Sh Shih, H.: A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Math. Comput. Model. 44(7), 749–761 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: ISRE, pp. 249–263 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: ISRE, pp. 226–235. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the ERC advanced grant 267856, ‘Lucretius: Foundations for Software Evolution’, www.lucretius.eu. A. Maté is funded by Generalitat Valenciana (APOSTD/2014/064).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elda Paja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paja, E., Maté, A., Woo, C., Mylopoulos, J. (2016). Can Goal Reasoning Techniques Be Used for Strategic Decision-Making?. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, IY., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46396-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46397-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics