Abstract
The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) constitutes one of the most influential as well as prevalent measures of environmental sustainability (ES) currently in use. In this piece of research, the earliest version of the EPI 2006 (the Pilot EPI) is employed for (a) uncovering the characteristics of the maximally sustainable country, and (b) assisting any interested country (either participating in the creation of the Pilot EPI, or not) on how to maximally increase its ES. A genetic algorithm (GA) is employed to this end, where (i) each of the three constructs of the Pilot EPI hierarchy (raw data, Proximity-to-Target data, and Policy Categories), (ii) the Pilot EPI scores, and (iii) the underlying relationship between (i) and (ii), are encoded in the (I) chromosomes, (II) fitness values and (III) fitness function, respectively, of the GA. Following GA convergence, the fittest chromosome(s) express the characteristics—in terms of EPI constructs—of the country(ies) of practically maximally attainable ES, with their fitness (Pilot EPI score) approximating the maximum value of 100 i.e. attaining almost ideal ES. Further to confirming the agreement between maximum Pilot EPI score and maximal fitness (which has not always been the case with other ES-related indices), the evolution per se of the GA population can be exploited for steering any interested country towards attaining maximal ES in a gradual, tailor-made manner. This performed as follows: at each step of that process, a chromosome (coming from any GA generation) that is sufficiently similar to the current construct values of the interested country, yet which demonstrates a higher fitness (Pilot EPI score) than the interested country, is selected; the necessary modifications in the interested country’s ES policies are implemented so that its construct values are made to approximate the values of the genes of the selected chromosome, thereby causing an increase in the country’s ES. The potential of selecting—at each step—the most convenient (viable for the interested country) as well as effective (causing maximal increase in ES via, either the easiest to implement, or the smallest) changes in the chromosome, adds efficiency and flexibility to the methodology; at the same time, alternative paths to the gradual improvement of the ES of the interested country are made available. By repeating this process as many times as desired, the interested country’s ES moves in a gradual manner towards the (theoretically established) maximal level of ES. The fitness function of the GA is represented via the most accurate approximation(s) from among (A) the methodology reported in the literature (whenever available), (B) polynomial approximation of various degrees, and (C) artificial neural networks (ANNs) of the general regression architecture (GRNN). Although neither approximation is capable of perfectly reproducing the relationship between each of the Pilot EPI constructs and the EPI scores (which puts into question the means of construction of the Pilot EPI), the GA is found successful in guiding the step-by-step changes that are deemed appropriate for gradually as well as maximally improving the level of ES of any country of interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
In cases where more than one next-best approximation are equally good for practical reasons, all of them are shown here.
- 3.
The use of the 16 raw data as inputs to the approximation is not shown here as this input has been found clearly inferior both to Proximity-to-Target data and to Policy Category inputs.
- 4.
References
Srebotnjak, T., Esty, D.C.: Measuring up: applying the environmental sustainability index. In: Yale Journal of International Affairs, Summer|Fall 2005, pp. 156–168. http://yalejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/051114srebotnjak-esty.pdf
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN): Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index (2006)
Measuring progress: a practical guide from the developers of the environmental performance index (EPI). http://epi.yale.edu/epi
Tambouratzis, T., Bardi, K.S., Mathioudaki, A.G.: How reproducible—and thus verifiable—is the environmental performance index?. Recent advances in environmental sciences and financial development. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environment, Ecosystems and Development (EEEAD 2014), Athens, Greece, November 28–30, 2014, pp. 27–33 (2014)
Tambouratzis, T., Bardi, K.S., Mathioudaki, A.G.: Comprehending the pilot environmental performance index. In: Proceedings of the 15th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI 2015), Exeter, U.K., September 7–9 (2015)
Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Reading. Addison-Wesley Professional, MA (1989)
The Mathorks. R2009a Matlab and Simulink (2009)
Pearson, K.: On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 2, 559–572 (1901)
Specht, D.F.: A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2, 568–576 (1991)
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr., C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983)
Hooke, R., Jeeves, T.A.: Direct search solution of numerical and statistical problems. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (ACM) 8(2), 212–229 (1961)
Tambouratzis, T.: A step-wise genetic-algorithm-based approach for improving the sustainability of any country and for determining the characteristics of the ideally sustainable country. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Computational Intelligence (WCCI) 2016, Vancouver, Canada, July 24–29 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fima, T.T. (2017). The Pilot Environmental Performance Index 2006 as a Tool for Optimising Environmental Sustainability at the Country Level. In: Angelov, P., Gegov, A., Jayne, C., Shen, Q. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 513. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46562-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46562-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46561-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46562-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)