Skip to main content

Exploring an Ontological Approach for User Requirements Elicitation in the Design of Online Virtual Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education (SIGSAND/PLAIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 264))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Effective user requirements elicitation is a key factor for the success of software development projects. There are many qualitative and quantitative research studies that promulgate particular methods and show the application of user requirements elicitation in particular domains. However, few try to eliminate the burden of ambiguity in gathered data, naturally occurring in different groups of stakeholders. This paper deals with this problem by introducing an ontology-based approach which by design provides a shared and common understanding of a domain. On the other hand, the developed ontology is a feasible communication facility for the stakeholders involved, acknowledged and controlled by a group of experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lowdermilk, T.: User-Centered Design: A Developer’s Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garrett, J.J.: The Elements of User Experience. New Riders, Indianapolis (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartson, R., Pyla, P.: The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J.: This is Service Design Thinking. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abbattista, F., Loops, P., Semerano, G., Andersen, H.: Evaluating virtual agents for e-commerce. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2361. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E.F.: Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lester, J., Branting, K., Mott, B.: Conversational agents. In: Singh, M.P. (ed.) The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. CRC Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lunardo, R., Bressoles, G., Durrieu, F.: The interacting effect of virtual agents’ gender and dressing style on attractiveness and subsequent consumer online behaviour. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 30, 59–66 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassell, J.: More than just another pretty face: embodied conversational interface agents. Commun. ACM 43(A), 70–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pentina, I., Taylor, D.G.: Exploring source effects for online sales outcomes: the role of avatar-buyer similarity. J. Customer Behav. 9(2), 135–150 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Payne, J., Szymkowiak, A., Robertson, P., Johnson, G.: Gendering the machine: preferred virtual assistant gender and realism in self-service. In: Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.) IVA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8108, pp. 106–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ales, Z., Duplessis, G.D., Serban, O., Pauchet, A.: A methodology to design human-like embodied conversational agents based on dialogue analysis. In: Proceedings of First International Workshop on Human-Agent Interaction Design and Models (HAIDM), AAMAS, pp. 34–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Przybyłek, A.: A business-oriented approach to requirements elicitation. In: 9th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, Lisbon (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sommerville, I., Kotonya, G.: Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scheinholtz, L.A., Wilmont, I.: Interview patterns for requirements elicitation. In: Berry, D. (ed.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 6606, pp. 72–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19858-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu-Cheng, T., Tempero, E.D., Thomborson, C.D.: An experiment on the impact of transparency on the effectiveness of requirements documents. Empirical Softw. Eng. 21(3), 1035–1066 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., Berry, D.M.: The effectiveness of an optimized EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for web site requirements elicitation. Requirements Eng. 17(3), 171–186 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gausepohl, K.A., Winchester III, W.W., Smith-Jackson, T.L., Kleiner, B.M., Arthur, J.D.: A conceptual model for the role of storytelling in design: leveraging narrative inquiry in user-centered design (UCD). Health Technol. 6(2), 1–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sikorski, M.: User-System Interaction Design in IT Projects. Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weichbroth, P., Sikorski, M.: User interface prototyping. techniques, methods and tools. In: Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, vol. 234, pp. 184–198, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prabhala, S., Loi, D., Ganapathy, S.: Ethnography, ethnography or ethnography? what happens when the same word means different things to different people? In: Marcus, A. (ed.) HCII 2011 and DUXU 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6769, pp. 102–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21675-6_12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rieu, D., Santorum, M., Movahedian, F.: A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Softw. Syst. Model. 1–24, 6 August 2015. doi:10.1007/s10270-015-0489-6

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seganti, A., Kaplanski, P., Zarzycki, P.: Collaborative editing of ontologies using fluent editor and ontorion. In: Tamma, V., Dragoni, M., Gonçalves, R., Lawrynowicz, A. (eds.) OWLED 2015. LNCS, vol. 9557, pp. 45–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33245-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplanski, P., Weichbroth, P.: Cognitum ontorion: knowledge representation and reasoning system. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS 2015), pp. 177–184 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Ossowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ossowska, K., Szewc, L., Weichbroth, P., Garnik, I., Sikorski, M. (2016). Exploring an Ontological Approach for User Requirements Elicitation in the Design of Online Virtual Agents. In: Wrycza, S. (eds) Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education. SIGSAND/PLAIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46642-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics