Skip to main content

Efficient Maximum Closeness Centrality Group Identification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Databases Theory and Applications (ADC 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9877))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As a key concept in the social networks, closeness centrality is widely adopted to measure the importance of a node. Many efficient algorithms are developed in the literature to find the top-k closeness centrality nodes. In most of the previous work, nodes are treated as irrelevant individuals for a top-k ranking. However, in many applications, it is required to find a set of nodes that is the most important as a group. In this paper, we extend the concept of closeness centrality to a set of nodes. We aim to find a set of k nodes that has the largest closeness centrality as a whole. We show that the problem is NP-hard, and prove that the objective function is monotonic and submodular. Therefore, the greedy algorithm can return a result with \(1-1/e\) approximation ratio. In order to handle large graphs, we propose a baseline sampling algorithm (BSA). We further improve the sampling approach by considering the order of samples and reducing the marginal gain update cost, which leads to our order based sampling algorithm (OSA). Finally, extensive experiments on four real world social networks demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that there are different variants of the definition of closeness centrality, in this paper we focus on the classic closeness centrality.

  2. 2.

    https://snap.stanford.edu/data/.

References

  1. Abboud, A., Grandoni, F., Williams, V.V.: Subcubic equivalences between graph centrality problems, APSP and diameter. In: SODA, pp. 1681–1697 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aloise, D., Deshpande, A., Hansen, P., Popat, P.: NP-hardness of euclidean sum-of-squares clustering. Mach. Learn. 75(2), 245–248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bavelas, A.: A mathematical model for small group structures. Hum. Organ. (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bavelas, A.: Communication patterns in task oriented groups. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22(6), 726–730 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonacich, P., Lloyd, P.: Eigenvector centrality and structural zeroes and ones: when is a neighbor not a neighbor? Soc. Netw. 43, 86–90 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25, 163–177 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chechik, S., Cohen, E., Kaplan, H.: Average distance queries through weighted samples in graphs and metric spaces: high scalability with tight statistical guarantees. In: APPROX/RANDOM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, E.: All-distances sketches, revisited: HIP estimators for massive graphs analysis. In: PODS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, E., Delling, D., Pajor, T., Werneck, R.F.: Computing classic closeness centrality, at scale. In: COSN (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eppstein, D., Wang, J.: Fast approximation of centrality. In: SODA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215–239 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Indyk, P.: Sublinear time algorithms for metric space problems. In: STOC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Okamoto, K., Chen, W., Li, X.-Y.: Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In: Preparata, F.P., Wu, X., Yin, J. (eds.) FAW 2008. LNCS, vol. 5059, pp. 186–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen, P.W., Labouseur, A.G., Hwang, J.: Efficient top-k closeness centrality search. In: ICDE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rattigan, M.J., Maier, M., Jensen, D.: Graph clustering with network structure indices. In: ICML, pp. 783–790 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thorup, M.: Quick k-Median, k-Center, and facility location for sparse graphs. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, p. 249. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, J., Lui, J.C., Towsley, D., Guan, X.: Measuring and maximizing group closeness centrality over disk-resident graphs. In: WWW 2014 Companion, pp. 689–694 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, C., Wang, W., Wang, X. (2016). Efficient Maximum Closeness Centrality Group Identification. In: Cheema, M., Zhang, W., Chang, L. (eds) Databases Theory and Applications. ADC 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46922-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46922-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46921-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46922-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics