Skip to main content

Opinions on Contested Infrastructures Over Time: A Longitudinal, Empirically Based Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1168 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 528))

Abstract

Using an agent-based model, we investigate the opinions of individuals on contested infrastructures over time. The model employs a psychological theory and a longitudinal study design. The longitudinal empirical data served as implementation and validation for the model. From the emerging results, we gained insights into the mechanisms of opinion adaptation; and discuss the relevance of opinion disaggregation, and the utilization of psychological theories and empirical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deffuant, G.: Comparing extremism propagation patterns in continuous opinion models. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 9, (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sherif, M., Hovland, C.I.: Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huet, S., Deffuant, G., Jager, W.: A rejection mechanism in 2D bounded confidence provides more conformity. Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 529–549 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jager, W., Amblard, F.: Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10, 295–303 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Keefe, D.J.: Social Judgment Theory. In: O’Keefe, D.J. (ed.) Persuasion: Theory and Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 5, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stefanelli, A., Seidl, R.: Moderate and polarized opinions. Using empirical data for an agent-based simulation. In: Proceedings of the Social Simulation Conference 2014 of the 10th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, pp. 61–64. Barcelona (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klügl, F.: A validation methodology for agent-based simulations. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC), pp. 39–43. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalisa Stefanelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 Equations used when the argument x is in the latitude of acceptance
Table A2 Equation used when the argument x is in the latitude of rejection
Fig. A1
figure a

Values of the risk-oriented argument over 500 interactions. Each curve represents an agent in the model. Red = argument in the latitude of rejection; Yellow = argument in the latitude of acceptance; Orange (parallel curves) = argument in the latitude of non-commitment

Fig. A2
figure b

Values of the benefit-oriented argument over 500 interactions. Each curve represents an agent in the model. Red = argument in the latitude of rejection; Yellow = argument in the latitude of acceptance; Orange (parallel curves) = argument in the latitude of non-commitment

Fig. A3
figure c

Values of the process-oriented argument over 500 interactions. Each curve represents an agent in the model. Red = argument in the latitude of rejection; Yellow = argument in the latitude of acceptance; Orange (parallel curves) = argument in the latitude of non-commitment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stefanelli, A. (2017). Opinions on Contested Infrastructures Over Time: A Longitudinal, Empirically Based Simulation. In: Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Flache, A., de Roo, G., Hoogduin, L., Hemelrijk, C. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 528. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47252-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47253-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics