Skip to main content

Increasing the Density of Local Landmarks in Wayfinding Instructions for the Visually Impaired

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Location-Based Services 2016

Abstract

Multiple approaches to support non-visual navigation have been proposed, of which traditional auditory turn-by-turn navigational systems achieved high popularity. Despite being modified according to the needs of visually impaired users, the underlying dataset communicated to the wayfinder is sourced primarily from traditional POI databases which are of limited use to blind navigators. This work proposes the use of environmental features spontaneously detected by blind navigators during their everyday locomotion as ‘local landmarks’ for enriching auditory navigational instructions. We report results of a survey which served to identify such environmental features. Consequently, we propose a list of potential local landmarks for the blind. Next, in a usability study, we demonstrate that enriching traditional turn-by-turn auditory instructions with local landmarks can improve the subjective satisfaction and confidence in navigation. Results indicate that the improvements seem to be achieved even without increasing the subjective complexity of the instructions. Finally we discuss how using local landmarks to enrich auditory navigational instructions can benefit visually impaired users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_for_the_visually_impaired.

  2. 2.

    http://www.ariadnegps.eu.

  3. 3.

    http://blindsquare.com.

  4. 4.

    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_for_the_blind.

  5. 5.

    It bears noting that the technique of communicating auditory information is, in itself, a research problem central to separate studies; however, the current work focuses on the content, and not the means of transmitting the landmark-enhanced wayfinding instructions.

  6. 6.

    Two participants asked for the instructions to be read in German, instead of the English recordings.

References

  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoń, K. (2014). MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.1. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn.

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4.

  • Blasch, B. B., Wiener, W. R., & Welsh, R. L. (1997). Foundations of orientation and mobility. Amer Foundation for the Blind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, N. A., & Dunlop, M. D. (2005). An Experimental Investigation into Wayfinding Directions for Visually Impaired People. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 9(6), 395–403. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0350-y.

  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Is Route Learning More Than Serial Learning? Spatial Cognition & Computation, 8(4), 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, G. E., & Lee, K. (2005). The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. In International Conference of Traffic and Transport Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caduff, D., & Timpf, S. (2008). On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cognitive Processing, 9(4), 249–67. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2.

  • Craik, F. I., & McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, A. K. (1996). Landmarks as navigational aids on street maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 23(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., Mores, C., Gras, D., Gyselinck, V., & Daniel, M.-P. (2014). Is Memory for Routes Enhanced by an Environment’s Richness in Visual Landmarks? Spatial Cognition & Computation, 5868(May 2016), 1–39. http://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.945586.

  • Gaunet, F. (2004). Verbal guidance rules for a localized wayfinding aid intended for blind-pedestrians in urban areas. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(4), 328–343. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0109-7.

  • Gaunet, F., & Briffault, X. (2005). Exploring the Functional Specifications of a Localized Wayfinding Verbal Aid for Blind Pedestrians: Simple and Structured Urban Areas. Human–Computer Interaction, 20, 267–314. Retrieved from http://gsc.up.univ-mrs.fr/gsite/Local/lpc/dir/gaunet/articles/Exploring the functional specifications of a localized wayfinding verbal aid.pdf.

  • Giudice, N. A., & Legge, G. E. (2008). Blind Navigation and the Role of Technology. The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence, 479–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., Marston, J. R., Loomis, J. M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2004). Stated preferences for components of a personal guidance system for nonvisual navigation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98(3), 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, R., & Truong, K. (2012). CrossingGuard: exploring information content in navigation aids for visually impaired pedestrians. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12, 405–414. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207733.

  • Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., & Knauff, M. (2006). Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 284–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutiyanawala, A., Kulyukin, V., & Bryce, D. (2010). On Self-sufficiency of verbal route directions for blind navigation with prior exposure. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference (CSUN 2010), San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package version 2.0-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 122(1), 73–91. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.73.

  • Mavros, P., Austwick, M. Z., & Hudson Smith, A. (2013). Geo-EEG: Towards the use of EEG in the study of urban behaviour, (April), 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9181-z.

  • May, A. J., Ross, T., Bayer, S. H., & Tarkiainen, M. J. (2003). Pedestrian navigation aids: Information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(6), 331–338. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0248-5.

  • Michon, P.-E., & Denis, M. (2001). When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? Spatial Information Theory, 2205, 292–305. http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20.

  • Miller, J., & Carlson, L. (2011). Selecting landmarks in novel environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 184–191. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0038-9.

  • Montello, D. R. (1998). A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In M. J. Egenhofer (Ed.), Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems (pp. 143–154). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R. (2001). Spatial Cognition. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14771–14775).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 257–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passini, R., & Proulx, G. (1988). Wayfinding without Vision: An Experiment with Congenitally Totally Blind People. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 227–252. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588202006.

  • Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 2478(1), 243–259. http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17.

  • Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks - GIScience for Intelligent Services. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D.-R. (2015). Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(February), n/a–n/a. http://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1375.

  • Schwering, A., Li, R., & Anacta, V. J. A. (2013). Orientation information in different forms of route instructions. In Short Paper Proceedings of the 16th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrão, M., Rodrigues, J. M. F., Rodrigues, J. I., & Du Buf, J. M. H. (2012). Indoor localization and navigation for blind persons using visual landmarks and a GIS. Procedia Computer Science, 14(Dsai), 65–73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.008.

  • Strothotte, T., Petrie, H., Johnson, V., & Reichert, L. (1995). MoBIC : user needs and preliminary design for a mobility aid for blind and elderly travellers. Computer, 1, 348–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swobodzinski, M., & Raubal, M. (2009). An Indoor Routing Algorithm for the Blind : Development and Comparison to a Routing Algorithm for the Sighted. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(10), 1315–1343. http://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802421115.

  • Tröndle, M., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V., & Tschacher, W. (2014). An Integrative and Comprehensive Methodology for Studying Aesthetic Experience in the Field Merging Movement Tracking, Physiology, and Psychological Data. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 102–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaagoubi, R., Edwards, G., Badard, T., & Mostafavi, M. A. (2012). Enhancing the mental representations of space used by blind pedestrians, based on an image schemata model. Cognitive Processing, 13(4), 333–347. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0523-3.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on Rajchandar Padmanaban’s Master Thesis carried out at the Institute for Geoinformatics of the University of Münster. The authors wish to thank Reinhard Silvers, Kerstin Gonschorrek and the Hansa Luftbild company for their support with data collection. We also thank all participants involved in the study for their time, effort, and many helpful advices as well as to Emily Harason for proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Krukar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Padmanaban, R., Krukar, J. (2017). Increasing the Density of Local Landmarks in Wayfinding Instructions for the Visually Impaired. In: Gartner, G., Huang, H. (eds) Progress in Location-Based Services 2016. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47289-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics