Abstract
This paper examines how the public perceived immigrant groups as potential risk, and how such risk perception changed after the attacks that took place in Paris on November 13, 2015. The study utilizes the Twitter conversations associated with different political leanings in the U.S., and mixed methods approach that integrated both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Risk perception profiles of Muslim, Islam, Latino, and immigrant were quantitatively constructed, based on how these groups/issues were morally judged as risk. Discourse analysis on how risk narratives constructed before and after the event was conducted. The study reveals that the groups/issues differed by how they were perceived as a risk or at risk across political leanings, and how the risk perception was related to in- and out-group biases. The study has important implication on how different communities conceptualize, perceive, and respond to danger, especially in the context of terrorism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sheridan, L.P.: Islamophobia pre-and post-September 11th, 2001. J. Interpers. Violence 21(3), 317–336 (2006)
Jenkin, C.M.: Risk perception and terrorism: applying the psychometric paradigm. Homel. Secur. Aff. 2(2) (2006)
Lupton, D.: Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. Sociol. Health Illness 23, 425–435 (2001)
Chavez, L.: The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2013)
Stephan, W.G., Ybarra, O., Bachman, G.: Prejudice toward immigrants1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(11), 2221–2237 (1999)
Tichenor, D.J.: Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)
Gray, K., Young, L., Waytz, A.: Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychol. Inq. 23(2), 101–124 (2012)
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S.P., Ditto, P.H.: Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: Devine, P., Plant, A. (eds.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 55–130 (2012)
Tajfel, H.: Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Cheong, M., Lee, V.C.S.: A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via Twitter. Inf. Syst. Front. 13(1), 45–59 (2011)
Awan, I.: Islamophobia and Twitter: a typology of online hate against Muslims on social media. Policy Internet 6(2), 133–150 (2014)
Williams, M.L., Burnap, P.: Cyberhate on social media in the aftermath of woolwich: a case study in computational criminology and big data. Br. J. Criminol. 56(2), 211–238 (2016)
Magdy, W., Darwish, K., Abokhodair, N., Quantifying public response towards Islam on Twitter after Paris attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.04570 (2015)
Puschmann, C., Ausserhofer, J., Maan, N., Hametner, M.: Information laundering, counter-publics: the news sources of islamophobic groups on Twitter. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
Burnap, P., Williams, M.L.: Us and them: identifying cyber hate on Twitter across multiple protected characteristics. EPJ Data Sci. 5(1), 1 (2016)
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Capelos, T., Provost, C.: The consequences of terrorism: disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Polit. Psychol. 23(3), 485–509 (2002)
Kemshall, H.: Risk, social policy and welfare. McGraw-Hill Education, Buckingham (2001)
Dasgupta, N.: Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2), 143–169 (2004)
Lin, Y.-R., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., Lazer, D., Voices of victory: a computational focus group framework for tracking opinion shift in real time. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 737–748. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2013)
Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., Lazer, D.: Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PLoS ONE 9(5), e94093 (2014)
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B.A.: Liberals, conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96(5), 1029 (2009)
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic Inquiry, Word Count: LIWC 2001, vol. 71. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)
Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1), 24–54 (2010)
Massey, D.S.: International migration at the dawn of the twenty-first century: the role of the state. Popul. Dev. Rev. 25(2), 303–322 (1999)
Massey, S.D., Pren, K.A.: Unintended consequences of US immigration policy: explaining the post-1965 surge from Latin America. Popul. Dev. Rev. 38(1), 1–29 (2012)
Hayworth, J.D., Eule, J.: Whatever It Takes: Illegal Immigration, Border Security, and the War on Terror. Regnery Publishing, Washington, D.C. (2005)
Echebarria-Echabe, A., Guede, E.F.: A new measure of Anti-Arab prejudice: reliability and validity evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37(5), 1077–1091 (2007)
Acknowledgement
This work is part of the research supported from NSF #1423697, #1634944 and the CRDF at the University of Pittsburgh. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding sources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chung, WT., Wei, K., Lin, YR., Wen, X. (2016). The Dynamics of Group Risk Perception in the US After Paris Attacks. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47879-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47880-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)