Skip to main content

A Distributed Decision Support Architecture for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Health Information Science (HIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10038))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clinical decision support for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer needs to be provided for a multidisciplinary team to improve the care. The execution of clinical knowledge in an appropriate representation to support decisions, however, is typically centrally orchestrated and inconsistent with the nature and environment that specialists work together. The use of guideline language of PROforma for breast cancer has been examined with the issues raised, and an agent-oriented distributed decision support architecture is put forward. The key components of this architecture include a goal-decomposition structure (shaping the architecture), agent planning rules (individual decision-making), and agent argumentation rules (reasoning among decision options). The shift from a centralised decision support solution to a distributed one is illustrated using the breast cancer scenario and this generic approach will be applied to a wider range of clinical problems in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NHS North of England Cancer Network: Breast Cancer Clinical Guidelines, p. 4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Healthcare services for breast cancer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patkar, V., et al.: Evidence-based guidelines and decision support services: a discussion and evaluation in triple assessment of suspected breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 95(11), 1490–1496 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreno, A., Nealon, J.L. (eds.): Application of Software Agent Technology in the Health Care Domain. Birkhäuser, Switzerland (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.S.: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312, 71 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Field, M.J., Lohr, K.N. (eds.): Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hripcsak, G., Ludemann, P., Pruor, T.A., Wigertz, O.B., Clayton, P.B.: Rationale for the Arden syntax. Comput. Biomed. Res. 27(4), 291–324 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peleg, M., et al.: GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 645–649 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, J., Das, S.: Safe and Sound: Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. Jointly published by the AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutton, D.R., Fox, J.: The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 10(5), 433–443 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): Referral guidelines for suspected cancer (CG27), p. 12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes: Non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening (NHSBSP Publication No 50) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Guidelines for the management of symptomatic breast disease (BASO). Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 3(1), S1–S21 (2005). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C.A., Balas, E.A., Lobach, D.F.: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330, 765 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao, L., Fox, J., Zhu, H.: An agent-oriented approach to support multidisciplinary care decisions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Eastern European Regional Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 2013), pp. 8–17. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61202101) & Dept. of Health on Data Exchange Standard for Hubei Provincial Care Platform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Xiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiao, L., Fox, J. (2016). A Distributed Decision Support Architecture for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. In: Yin, X., Geller, J., Li, Y., Zhou, R., Wang, H., Zhang, Y. (eds) Health Information Science. HIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48335-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48335-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48334-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48335-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics