Skip to main content

Understanding Factors That Affect Web Traffic via Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2016 (WISE 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10042))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 974 Accesses

Abstract

Currently, millions of companies, organizations and individuals take advantage of the social media function of Twitter to promote themselves. One of the most important goals is to attract web traffic. In this paper, we study the problem of obtaining web traffic via Twitter. We approach this problem in two stages. First, we analyze the correlation between important factors and the click number of URLs in tweets. Through measurements, we find that the commonly accepted method, increasing followers by reciprocal exchanges of links, has limited effects on improving the number of clicks. And characteristics of tweets (such as the presence of hashtags and tweet length) exert different impacts on users with different influence levels for obtaining the click number. In our second stage, based on the analyses, we introduce the Multi-Task Learning (MTL) to build a model for predicting the number of clicks. This model takes into account the specific characters of users with different influence levels to improve the predictive accuracy. The experiments, based on Twitter data, show the predictive performance is significantly higher than the baseline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.alexa.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://dev.bitly.com/api.html.

References

  1. How to use twitter to increase web traffic. http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Twitter-to-Increase-Web-Traffic

  2. Twitter announces 100 million active users. http://mashable.com/2011/09/08/twitter-has-100-million-active-users

  3. Antoniades, D., Polakis, I., Kontaxis, G., Athanasopoulos, E., Ioannidis, S., Markatos, E.P., Karagiannis, T.: we.b: the web of short URLs. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 715–724 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakhshi, S., Kanuparthy, P., Shamma, D.A.: Understanding online reviews: funny, cool or useful? In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1270–1276 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 65–74 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandari, R., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: The pulse of news in social media: forecasting popularity. In: The Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 26–33 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bao, P., Shen, H.W., Huang, J., Cheng, X.Q.: Popularity prediction in microblogging network: a case study on Sina Weibo. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 177–178 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, J., Adamic, L., Dow, P.A., Kleinberg, J.M., Leskovec, J.: Can cascades be predicted? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World wide web, pp. 925–936 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Comarela, G., Crovella, M., Almeida, V., Benevenuto, F.: Understanding factors that affect response rates in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 123–132 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, S., Ma, J., Chen, Z.: Effective and effortless features for popularity prediction in microblogging network. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 269–270 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh, S., Viswanath, B., Kooti, F., Sharma, N.K., Korlam, G., Benevenuto, F., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Understanding and combating link farming in the Twitter social network. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 61–70 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong, L., Dan, O., Davison, B.D.: Predicting popular messages in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World wide Web, pp. 57–58 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hutto, C., Yardi, S., Gilbert, E.: A longitudinal study of follow predictors on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 821–830 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jenders, M., Kasneci, G., Naumann, F.: Analyzing and predicting viral tweets. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 657–664 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khosla, A., Das Sarma, A., Hamid, R.: What makes an image popular? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 867–876 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kupavskii, A., Ostroumova, L., Umnov, A., Usachev, S., Serdyukov, P., Gusev, G., Kustarev, A.: Prediction of retweet cascade size over time. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2335–2338 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lichen, L., Cherkassky, V.: Connection between SVM+ and multi-task learning. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 2048–2054 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Factors influencing the response rate in social question and answering behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1263–1274 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues, T., Benevenuto, F., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., Almeida, V.: On word-of-mouth based discovery of the web. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 381–396 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Romero, D.M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: Influence and passivity in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2011 European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 18–33 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stringhini, G., Wang, G., Egele, M., Kruegel, C., Vigna, G., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.Y.: Follow the green: growth and dynamics in Twitter follower markets. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 163–176 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 177–184 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szabo, G., Huberman, B.A.: Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM 53, 80–88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, K., Grier, C., Song, D., Paxson, V.: Suspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of Twitter spam. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 243–258 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vasconcelos, M., Almeida, J.M., Goncalves, M.A.: Predicting the popularity of micro-reviews: a foursquare case study. Inf. Sci. 325, 355–374 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao, Q., Erdogdu, M.A., He, H.Y., Rajaraman, A., Leskovec, J.: SEISMIC: a self-exciting point process model for predicting tweet popularity. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1513–1522 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61402151 and 61272527), Science and Technology Foundation of Henan Province of China (No. 162102410010), and Open Research Fund of Network and Data Security Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province of China (No. NDS2015-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunjing Xiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiao, C., Qin, Z., Luo, X., Kuzmanovic, A. (2016). Understanding Factors That Affect Web Traffic via Twitter. In: Cellary, W., Mokbel, M., Wang, J., Wang, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Y. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2016. WISE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48743-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48743-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48742-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48743-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics