Skip to main content

Towards Drug Counterfeit Detection Using Package Paperboard Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9917))

Abstract

Most approaches for product counterfeit detection are based on identification using some unique marks or properties implemented into each single product or its package. In this paper we investigate a classification approach involving existing packaging only in order to avoid higher production costs involved with marking each individual product. To detect counterfeit packages, images of the package’s interior showing the plain structure of the paperboard are captured. Using various texture features and SVM classification we are able to distinguish drug packages coming from different manufacturers and also forged packages with high accuracy while a distinction between single packages of the same manufacturer is not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buchanon, J., Cowburn, R., Jausovec, A.-V., Petit, S.: Forgery: fingerprinting documents and packaging. Nature 436(7050), 475 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cimpoi, M., Maji, S., Kokkinos, I., Mohamed, S., Vedaldi, A.: Describing textures in the wild. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarkson, W., Weyrich, T., Finkelstein, A., Heninger, N., Halderman, J.A., Felten, E.W.: Fingerprinting blank paper using commodity scanners. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 301–314 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diephuis, M., Voloshynovskiy, S., Holotyak, T., Stendardo, N., Keel, B.: A framework for fast and secure packaging identification on mobile phones. In: Proceedings of SPIE Photonics West, Electronic Imaging, Media Forensics and Security V, San Francisco, USA, 23 January, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diephuis, M., Voloshynovskiy, S., Beekhof, F.: Physical object identification based on famos microstructure fingerprinting: comparison of templates versus invariant features. In: 8th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, Trieste, Italy, 4–6 September, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diephuis, M., Voloshynovskiy, S., Holotyak, T.: Sketchprint: physical object micro-structure identification using mobile phones. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Nice, France, 31 August - 4, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kannala, J., Rahtu, E.: BSIF: binarized statistical image features. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR, Tsukuba, Japan, November 11–15, pp. 1363–1366 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta, R., Egiazarian, K.: Texture classification using dense micro-block difference (DMD). In: Cremers, D., Reid, I., Saito, H., Yang, M.-H. (eds.) ACCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 9004, pp. 643–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16808-1_43

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metois, E., Yarin, P., Salzman, N., Smith, J.: Fiberfingerprint identification. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Automatic Identification, New York City, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mikkilineni, A.K., Chiang, P.-J., Ali, G.N., Chiu, G.T.C., Allebach, J.P., Delp, E.J.: Printer identification based on graylevel co-occurrence features for security and forensic applications, vol. 5681, pp. 430–440 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muhammad, G.: Multi-scale local texture descriptor for image forgery detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pp. 1146–1151 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. OECD and EUIPO: Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods, p. 138. OECD Publishing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Harwood, D.: Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on kullback discrimination of distributions. In: Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 582–585, October 1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ojansivu, V., Rahtu, E., Heikkila, J.: Rotation invariant local phase quantization for blur insensitive texture analysis. In: 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICpPR 2008, pp. 1–4, December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.H. Organization. International medical products taskforce - brochure. http://apps.who.int/impact/FinalBrochureWHA2008a.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 29 Apr 2016

  17. Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: A statistical approach to material classification using image patch exemplars. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(11), 2032–2047 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Voloshynovskiy, S., Diephuis, M., Beekhof, F., Koval, O., Keel, B.: Towards reproducible results in authentication based on physical non-cloneable functions: the forensic authentication microstructure optical set (famos). In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, Tenerife, Spain, 2–5 December 2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wong, C.W., Wu, M.: Counterfeit detection using paper PUF and mobile cameras. In: 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pp. 1–6, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wong, C.W., Wu, M.: A study on PUF characteristics for counterfeit detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 1643–1647, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zuiderveld, K.: Graphics gems iv. chapter contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization, pp. 474–485. Academic Press Professional Inc, San Diego, CA, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Munich based software venture eMundo which receives funding from the Central Innovation Program for SMEs by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (project “FakeFinder” no. ZIM-EP150145).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christof Kauba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kauba, C., Debiasi, L., Schraml, R., Uhl, A. (2016). Towards Drug Counterfeit Detection Using Package Paperboard Classification. In: Chen, E., Gong, Y., Tie, Y. (eds) Advances in Multimedia Information Processing - PCM 2016. PCM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9917. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48896-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48896-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48895-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48896-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics