Skip to main content

Constructional Coercion in the Evolution of Contemporary Chinese Morphemes—Taking “Fen”(粉) as an Example

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1584 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10085))

Abstract

In contemporary Chinese, morphemes are changing with the development of vocabulary. During the evolution of morphemes, constructional coercion has played an important role. It is a mechanism to adjust semantic conflict and type mismatch, and will sometimes cause the change of meaning in the component of the construction. Chinese morpheme “fen”(Chinese character “粉”)has evolved from a meaningless transliterated syllable to a nominal morpheme and then a verb to express events, which is a semantical evolution chain from specific to abstract, and from special indication to general reference. Constructional coercion has played a vital role in the process. This paper takes the new Chinese morpheme “fen(粉)” as an example in order to analysis and explain the reason of its evolution using the theory of constructional coercion on the bases of a clear semantical evolutional trace of “fen(粉)”.

This paper is funded by Ministry of Education’s humanities & social sciences research program “A Study of the Forming and Evolution of Chinese Morphemes Based on Quantitative Analysis”(11YJC740146) and Social Science Planning Study Program of Shandong Province(10DWXJ05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zhou, R.: “fensi””tiesi” and “gangsi”. Rhetoric Learning (6) (2006). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, L., Qu, W.: A Study of the Semantic Complementation of Foreign Words and Native Words: Take the Introduction of ‘Fen’ as an Example. Contemporary Rhetoric (2) (2011). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, H.: New Meanings of ‘Fen’. Modern Chinese (4) (2012). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, A.E.: Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michaelis, L.A.: Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15, 1–67 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi, C., Zhao, P., Qiu, Z.: Bilateral Interaction Joint Force Mechanism. Contemporary Rhetoric (2) (2014). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, L.: From “Fensi” to “Shanzi”. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Sciences) (3) (2007). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y.: A Study of the Cognitive Mechanism of ‘Ba’ Construction. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages (1) (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan, C.: On the Discreteness of Zi. Foreign Languages Research (2) (2009). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Su, X.: On formation and extraction of monosyllabic morphemes of foreign origins in Contemporary Chinese. Chinese Language (6) (2003). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Song, Z.: Construction Coercion in Modifier-Head Compound Nouns. Chinese Teaching in the World (4) (2014). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michaelis, L: Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In: Ostman, J., Fried, M., (eds.) Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Francis, E.J., Michaelis, L.A. (eds.): Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. CSLI, Stanford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, D.: Nominalization and Verbalization in Contemporary Chinese: A Cognitive Linguistic Inquiry. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 5, 112–113 (2001). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi, C.: The Grammatical and Rhetorical Interaction of Constructional Coercion. Contemporary Rhetoric (1) (2012). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pustejovsky, J.: The generative lexicon, vol. 61, pp. 85–86. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pustejovsky, J., Jezek, E.: Semantic coercion in language: Beyond distributional analysis. Italian Journal of Linguistics 20, 181–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song, Z.: Logical Metonymy, Event Coercion and Noun-to-verb Transformation. Linguistic Sciences (2) (2013). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, X. (2016). Constructional Coercion in the Evolution of Contemporary Chinese Morphemes—Taking “Fen”(粉) as an Example. In: Dong, M., Lin, J., Tang, X. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10085. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49507-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49508-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics