Skip to main content

On the Lexical Characteristics of Deception

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1614 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10085))

Abstract

The use of language reflects the way of people thinking. Some research indicate that, people show significant differences in their cognitive state when they are lying. And the differences further reflect in their external language behaviors, which suggests the possibility of distinguishing truth from deception through verbal cues. Expanding the previous studies which mainly focus on the analysis of fabricated events or facts, in this study, we construct a Chinese opinion-oriented deception corpus. Based on the observation and statistics of different word usages in the deceptive and non-deceptive speech, this paper examined the possible word categories which may serve as cues to distinguish between genuine and deceptive reviews, e.g. the second-person pronouns, direct speech and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bond, G., Lee, A.Y.: Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 313–329 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgoon, J., Blair, J., Qin, T., Nunamaker, J.: Detecting Deception through Linguistic Analysis. Intelligence and Security Informatics 2665, 91–101 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, T.R., Gunia, B.C., Kim-Jun, S.Y., Murnighan, J.K.: Do groups lie more than individuals? Honesty and deception as a function of strategic self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(6), 1321–1324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E., Wyer, M.M., Epstein, J.A.: Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(5), 979–995 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J.J., Molone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129, 74–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman, P.: Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage (《如何戳穿谎言》). Shanghai Culture Publishing House (1989). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ford, C.: Lies!Lies!Lies! (《说谎:你所不知道的一切》). Xinhua Publishing House (2001). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, R., Hao, B., Li, H., Gao, Y., Zhu, T.: Developing simplified Chinese psychological linguistic analysis dictionary for microblog. In: International Conference on Brain & Health Informatics (BHI’13). Maebashi, Japan, pp. 359–368 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hancock, J., Curry, L., Goorha, S., Woodworth, M.: On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Processes 45(1), 1–23 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hancock, J.T.: Digital deception: when, where and how people lie online. In: McKenna, K., Postmes, T., Reips, U., Joinson, A.N. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, pp. 287–301. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCornack, S.A.: Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs 59, 1–16 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman, M., Pennebaker, J., Berry, D., Richards, J.: Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 665–675 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, W.: Overview of Research on Lies in the West (西方谎言研究理论综述). Social Sciences Abroad 2, 25–31 (2008). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walters, S.: The Truth About Lying: How to Spot a Lie and Protect Yourself from Deception (《挑战谎言——识别谎言的技巧》). Nanhai Press (2001). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, F.W.: The Identification and Study on Lie (《谎言的识别研究》), PhD dissertation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, T.Y., Zhang, Y.Q.: A Review on Studies of Lying and Lie-detection (说谎作为及其识别的心理学研究). Advances in Psychological Science 16(4), 651–660 (2008). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J., Numamaker, J., Twitchell, D.: Automating Linguistics-based Cues for Detecting Deception in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communications. Group Decision and Negotiation 13, 81–106 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Su, Q. (2016). On the Lexical Characteristics of Deception. In: Dong, M., Lin, J., Tang, X. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10085. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49507-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49508-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics