Abstract
Social network analysis as a technique has been applied to a diverse set of fields, including, organizational behavior, sociology, economics and biology. However, for sensitive networks such as hate networks, trust networks and sexual networks, these techniques have been sparsely used. This is majorly attributed to the unavailability of network data. Anonymization is the most commonly used technique for performing privacy preserving network analysis. The process involves the presence of a trusted third party, who is aware of the complete network, and releases a sanitized version of it. In this paper, we propose an alternative, in which, the desired analysis can be performed by the parties who distributedly hold the network, such that: (a) no central third party is required; (b) the topology of the underlying network is kept hidden. We design multiparty protocols for securely performing few of the commonly studied social network analysis algorithms, which include degree distribution, closeness centrality, PageRank algorithm and K-shell decomposition algorithm. The designed protocols are proven to be secure in the presence of an arithmetic black-box extended with comparison, equality and modulo operations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)
Barrat, A., Weigt, M.: On the properties of small-world network models. Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens. Matter Complex Syst. 13(3), 547–560 (2000)
Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Netw. 21(4), 375–395 (2000)
Eguiluz, V.M., Chialvo, D.R., Cecchi, G.A., Baliki, M., Apkarian, A.V.: Scale-free brain functional networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(1), 018102 (2005)
Kim, Y., Choi, T.Y., Yan, T., Dooley, K.: Structural investigation of supply networks: a social network analysis approach. J. Oper. Manage. 29(3), 194–211 (2011)
Easley, D., Kleinberg, J., et al.: Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Significance 9, 43–44 (2012)
Liljeros, F., Giesecke, J., Holme, P.: The contact network of inpatients in a regional healthcare system. a longitudinal case study. Math. Popul. Stud. 14(4), 269–284 (2007)
Rocha, L.E., Liljeros, F., Holme, P.: Simulated epidemics in an empirical spatiotemporal network of 50,185 sexual contacts. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(3), e1001109 (2011)
Heatherly, R., Kantarcioglu, M., Thuraisingham, B.: Preventing private information inference attacks on social networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(8), 1849–1862 (2013)
Tassa, T., Cohen, D.J.: Anonymization of centralized and distributed social networks by sequential clustering. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(2), 311–324 (2013)
Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: De-anonymizing social networks. In: 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 173–187. IEEE (2009)
Narayanan, A., Shi, E., Rubinstein, B.I.: Link prediction by de-anonymization: How we won the kaggle social network challenge. In: The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1825–1834. IEEE (2011)
Bhaskar, R., Laxman, S., Smith, A., Thakurta, A.: Discovering frequent patterns in sensitive data. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 503–512. ACM (2010)
Kleinberg, J.M.: Challenges in mining social network data: processes, privacy, and paradoxes. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 4–5. ACM (2007)
Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2008, pp. 111–125. IEEE (2008)
Xue, M., Karras, P., Chedy, R., Kalnis, P., Pung, H.K.: Delineating social network data anonymization via random edge perturbation. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 475–484. ACM (2012)
Fard, A.M., Wang, K.: Neighborhood randomization for link privacy in social network analysis. World Wide Web 18(1), 9–32 (2015)
Hogg, T., Adamic, L.: Enhancing reputation mechanisms via online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 236–237. ACM (2004)
Yao, A.C.C.: Protocols for secure computations. FOCS 82, 160–164 (1982)
Brickell, J., Shmatikov, V.: Privacy-preserving graph algorithms in the semi-honest model. In: Roy, B. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3788, pp. 236–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11593447_13
Aly, A., Cuvelier, E., Mawet, S., Pereira, O., Vyve, M.: Securely solving simple combinatorial graph problems. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 239–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_21
Aly, A., Vyve, M.: Securely solving classical network flow problems. In: Lee, J., Kim, J. (eds.) ICISC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8949, pp. 205–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15943-0_13
Blanton, M., Steele, A., Alisagari, M.: Data-oblivious graph algorithms for secure computation and outsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSAC Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 207–218. ACM (2013)
Frikken, K.B., Golle, P.: Private social network analysis: how to assemble pieces of a graph privately. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Privacy in Electronic Society, pp. 89–98. ACM (2006)
Kukkala, V.B., Iyengar, S., Saini, J.S.: Secure multiparty graph computation. In: 2016 8th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), pp. 1–2. IEEE (2016)
Kerschbaum, F., Schaad, A.: Privacy-preserving social network analysis for criminal investigations. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 9–14. ACM (2008)
Fridgen, G., Garizy, T.Z.: Supply chain network risk analysis - A privacy preserving approach. In: 23rd European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2015, Münster, Germany, 26–29 May 2015
Tassa, T., Bonchi, F.: Privacy preserving estimation of social influence. In: EDBT, pp. 559–570 (2014)
Cramer, R., Damgard, I., Nielsen, J.B.: Secure multiparty computation and secret sharing-an information theoretic appoach. Book Draft (2012)
Ben-Or, M., Goldwasser, S., Wigderson, A.: Completeness theorems for non-cryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 1–10. ACM (1988)
Paillier, P.: Public-Key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-X_16
Damgård, I., Fitzi, M., Kiltz, E., Nielsen, J.B., Toft, T.: Unconditionally secure constant-rounds multi-party computation for equality, comparison, bits and exponentiation. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 285–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11681878_15
Kukkala, V.B., Saini, J.S., Iyengar, S.: Privacy preserving network analysis of distributed social networks. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/427 (2016). http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/427
Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825), 268–276 (2001)
Albert, R., Barabási, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74(1), 47 (2002)
Dorogovtsev, S.N., Mendes, J.F.: Evolution of networks. Adv. Phys. 51(4), 1079–1187 (2002)
Adamic, L.A., Huberman, B.A.: Power-law distribution of the world wide web. Science 287(5461), 2115–2115 (2000)
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., Faloutsos, C.: On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 29, pp. 251–262. ACM (1999)
Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 29–42. ACM (2007)
Bavelas, A.: Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22(6), 726–730 (1950)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Hsieh, C.S., Kovářík, J., Logan, T.: How central are clients in sexual networks created by commercial sex? Scientific reports 4 (2014)
Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web (1999)
Brin, S., Page, L.: Reprint of: the anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. 56(18), 3825–3833 (2012)
Franceschet, M.: Pagerank: standing on the shoulders of giants. Commun. ACM 54(6), 92–101 (2011)
Kitsak, M., Gallos, L.K., Havlin, S., Liljeros, F., Muchnik, L., Stanley, H.E., Makse, H.A.: Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Phys. 6(11), 888–893 (2010)
Batagelj, V., Zaversnik, M.: An o (m) algorithm for cores decomposition of networks. arXiv preprint cs/0310049 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kukkala, V.B., Saini, J.S., Iyengar, S.R.S. (2016). Privacy Preserving Network Analysis of Distributed Social Networks. In: Ray, I., Gaur, M., Conti, M., Sanghi, D., Kamakoti, V. (eds) Information Systems Security. ICISS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10063. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49806-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49806-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49805-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49806-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)