Skip to main content

MaxSD: A Neural Machine Translation Evaluation Metric Optimized by Maximizing Similarity Distance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications (ICCPOL 2016, NLPCC 2016)

Abstract

We propose a novel metric for machine translation evaluation based on neural networks. In the training phrase, we maximize the distance between the similarity scores of high and low-quality hypotheses. Then, the trained neural network is used to evaluate the new hypotheses in the testing phase. The proposed metric can efficiently incorporate lexical and syntactic metrics as features in the network and thus is able to capture different levels of linguistic information. Experiments on WMT-14 show state-of-the-art performance is achieved in two out of five language pairs on the system-level and one on the segment-level. Comparative results are also achieved in the remaining language pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bojar, O., Buck, C., Callison-Burch, C., Federmann, C., Haddow, B., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Post, M., Soricut, R., Specia, L.: Findings of the 2013 workshop on statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 1–44. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2013

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Schroeder, J.: (Meta-) evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 136–158. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denkowski, M., Lavie, A.: Meteor universal: language specific translation evaluation for any target language. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gautam, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: LAYERED: metric for machine translation evaluation. In: ACL 2014, p. 387 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graham, Y., Baldwin, T.: Testing for significance of increased correlation with human judgment. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, pp. 172–176. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2014. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1020

  6. Gupta, R., Orasan, C., van Genabith, J.: ReVal: a simple and effective machine translation evaluation metric based on recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1066–1072. Association for Computational Linguistics, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. EMNLP 14, 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Snover, M., Madnani, N., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R.: Fluency, adequacy, or HTER? Exploring different human judgments with a tunable MT metric. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Athens, Greece, pp. 259–268. Association for Computational Linguistics, March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanojevic, M., Sima’an, K.: BEER: better evaluation as ranking. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp. 414–419. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, H., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Liu, Q., Lin, S.: An automatic machine translation evaluation metric based on dependency parsing model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01996 (2015)

  14. Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O.: Recurrent neural network regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2329 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China under Grant No. 61379086, European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 645452 (QT21), and the ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology (www.adaptcentre.ie) at Dublin City University funded under the SFI Research Centres Programme (Grant 13/RC/2106) co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingsong Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, Q. et al. (2016). MaxSD: A Neural Machine Translation Evaluation Metric Optimized by Maximizing Similarity Distance. In: Lin, CY., Xue, N., Zhao, D., Huang, X., Feng, Y. (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. ICCPOL NLPCC 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50496-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics