Skip to main content

Leveraging Hierarchical Deep Semantics to Classify Implicit Discourse Relations via Mutual Learning Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10102))

Abstract

This paper presents a mutual learning method using hierarchical deep semantics for the classification of implicit discourse relations in English. With the absence of explicit discourse markers, traditional discourse techniques mainly concentrate on discrete linguistic features in this task, which always leads to data sparse problem. To relieve this problem, we propose a mutual learning neural model which makes use of multilevel semantic information together, including the distribution of implicit discourse relations, the semantics of arguments and the co-occurrence of words. During the training process, the predicted target of the model which is the probability of the discourse relation type, and the distributed representation of semantic components are learnt jointly and optimized mutually. The results of both binary and multiclass identification show that this method outperforms previous works since the mutual learning strategy can distinguish Expansion type from the others efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2011T07.

References

  1. Pitler, E., et al.: Easily identifiable discourse relations. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Posters Proceedings, COLING 2008, 18–22 August 2008, Manchester, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Park, J., Cardie, C.: Improving implicit discourse relation recognition through feature set optimization. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prasad, R., Miltsakaki, E., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A.: The Penn discourse treebank 2.0 annotation manual. In: Proceedings of LREC, vol. 24, p. 2961 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bengio, Y., Schwenk, H., Senécal, J.S., Morin, F., Gauvain, J.L.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26, p. 3111 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biran, O., Mckeown, K.: Aggregated word pair features for implicit discourse relation disambiguation. In: Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 69 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marcu, D., Echihabi, A.: An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 368 p. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soricut, R., Marcu, D.: Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 149 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson, L., Marcu, D., Okurowski, M.E.: Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Springer, Netherlands (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Wellner, B., Pustejovsky, J., Havasi, C., Rumshisky, A., Saurí, R.: Classification of discourse coherence relations: an exploratory study using multiple knowledge sources. In: Proceedings of 7th SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, vol. 117 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf, F., Gibson, E.: Representing discourse coherence: a corpus-based study. Comput. Linguist. 32, 249 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitler E., Louis A., Nenkova A.: Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. In: ACL 2009, Proceedings of the Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, 2–7 August 2009, Singapore, vol. 683 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, Z., Kan, M.Y., Ng, H.T.: Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 343 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, W.T., Su, J., Tan, C.L.: Kernel based discourse relation recognition with temporal ordering information. In: ACL 2010, Proceedings of the Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11–16 July 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, vol. 710 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, Z.M., Xu, Y., Niu, Z.Y., Lan, M., Su, J., Tan, C.L.: Predicting discourse connectives for implicit discourse relation recognition. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lan, M., Xu, Y., Niu, Z.: Leveraging synthetic discourse data via multi-task learning for implicit discourse relation recognition. In: Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher, R., Simmons, R.: Spectral semi-supervised discourse relation classification, Beijing, China, 89 p. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Braud, C.E., Denis, P.: Combining natural and artificial examples to improve implicit discourse relation identification, Dublin, Ireland, 1694 p. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J.Y., Chuang, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y., Potts, C.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, M., Cui, T., Tu, W.: Ordering-sensitive and semantic-aware topic modeling. In: Computer Science (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Le, Q.V., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Computer Science, vol. 4, p. 1188 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rutherford, A.T., Xue, N.: Discovering implicit discourse relations through Brown cluster pair representation and conference patterns, vol. 645 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rutherford, A., Xue, N.: Improving the inference of implicit discourse relations via classifying explicit discourse connectives. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marcus, M.P., Marcinkiewicz, M.A., Santorini, B.: Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn treebank. Comput. Linguist. 19, 313 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 7, 347 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stone, P.J.: The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (1966)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the organizers of NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 and the reviewers for their helpful suggestions. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61202244, 61502259) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB329303).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Jian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

She, X., Jian, P., Zhang, P., Huang, H. (2016). Leveraging Hierarchical Deep Semantics to Classify Implicit Discourse Relations via Mutual Learning Method. In: Lin, CY., Xue, N., Zhao, D., Huang, X., Feng, Y. (eds) Natural Language Understanding and Intelligent Applications. ICCPOL NLPCC 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50496-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics