Skip to main content

Towards a Probabilistic Analysis for Conditionals and Unconditionals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10091))

Abstract

The thesis that the probability of a conditional is the corresponding conditional probability of C, given A, enjoys wide currency among philosophers and growing empirical support in psychology. In this paper I ask how a probabilisitic account of conditionals along these lines could be extended to unconditional sentences, i.e., conditionals with interrogative antecedents. Such sentences are typically interpreted as equivalent to conjunctions of conditionals. This raises a number of challenges for a probabilistic account, chief among them the question of what the probability of a conjunction of conditionals should be. I offer an analysis which addresses these issues by extending the interpretation of conditonals in Bernoulli models to the case of unconditionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A competing usage in the descriptive linguistic literature calls the constituents protasis and apodosis, but this usage is not widespread in formal semantics or philosophy.

  2. 2.

    This glosses over important points of variation, for instance as to whether the set of propositions is taken to be the set of possible answers, of true answers, and whether its members are required to cover or partition the set of all possibilities [9, 11, 13]. These are important issues, but they are not crucial for the purposes of this paper.

  3. 3.

    The typographical similarity with the conventions of Inquisitive Semantics [3, 8], is intended, although in this paper I do not pursue an in-depth study of this connection.

  4. 4.

    Certain counterexamples have been discussed in the literature, but there is hope that those can be explained as systematic deviations that do not undermine the general idea, but rather help to fine-tune its application in particular cases [14, 19, 29].

  5. 5.

    \(\mathcal {F}\subseteq \wp (\varOmega )\) is \(\sigma \)-algebra iff it contains \(\varOmega \) and is closed under complement and countable union. \(\Pr : \mathcal {F}\mapsto [0,1]\) is a probability measure iff \(\Pr (\varOmega ) = 1\) and for any countable set of pairwise disjoint \(X_i \in \mathcal {F}, \Pr (\bigcup _i X_i) = \sum _i \Pr (X_i)\).

  6. 6.

    Random variables with range \(\{0,1\}\) are also called indicator functions.

  7. 7.

    For continuous variables, the summation is replaced by integration, but the basic idea is the same. I write ‘\(Pr(\zeta =x)\)’ as shorthand for ‘\(Pr\left( \{\omega \in \varOmega |\zeta (\omega )=x\}\right) \)’.

  8. 8.

    See [10] for a survey of the status quo in 1994. My own attempt at a readable exposition is found in [15], but see [4] for more.

  9. 9.

    Van Fraassen called the construction “Stalnaker Bernoulli model” since he saw in it the probabilistic analog of a Stalnaker-style selection function.

  10. 10.

    More complex compounds also receive truth values and probabilities under the approach, but those are hard to evaluate because intuitive judgments are not easy to come by.

References

  1. Adams, E.: The logic of conditionals. Inquiry 8, 166–197 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, J.: A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F.: Generalized inquisitive semantics and logic (2009). http://sites.google.com/site/inquisitivesemantics/. Accessed Nov 2009

  4. Edgington, D.: On conditionals. Mind 104(414), 235–329 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Eells, E., Skyrms, B. (eds.): Probabilities and Conditionals: Belief Revision and Rational Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, J.S., Over, D.E.: If. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Fraassen, B.C.: Probabilities of conditionals. In: Harper, W.L., Stalnaker, R., Pearce, G. (eds.) Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, pp. 261–308. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1976)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics (2009). http://sites.google.com/site/inquisitivesemantics/. Accessed Nov 2009

  9. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Studies in the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hájek, A., Hall, N.: The hypothesis of the conditional construal of conditional probability. In: Eells and Skyrms [5], pp. 75–110

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamblin, C.L.: Questions. Australas. J. Philos. 36(3), 159–168 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffrey, R.C.: If. J. Philos. 61, 702–703 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguist. Philos. 1, 3–44 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann, S.: Conditioning against the grain: abduction and indicative conditionals. J. Philos. Logic 33(6), 583–606 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann, S.: Conditional predictions: a probabilistic account. Linguist. Philos. 28(2), 181–231 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaufmann, S.: Conditionals right and left: probabilities for the whole family. J. Philos. Logic 38, 1–53 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaufmann, S.: Unconditionals are conditionals. Handout, DIP Colloquium, University of Amsterdam. http://stefan-kaufmann.uconn.edu/Papers/Amsterdam2010_hout.pdf

  18. Kaufmann, S.: Conditionals, conditional probabilities, and conditionalization. In: Zeevat, H., Schmitz, H.-C. (eds.) Bayesian Natural Language Semantics and Pragmatics. LCM, vol. 2, pp. 71–94. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17064-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Khoo, J.: Probabilities of conditionals in context. Linguist. Philos. 39, 1–43 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, D.: Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. Philos. Rev. 85, 297–315 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mellor, D.H. (ed.): Philosophical Papers: F. P. Ramsey. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oaksford, M., Chater, N.: Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind Lang. 18(4), 359–379 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oaksford, M., Chater, N.: Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramsey, F.P.: General propositions and causality. Printed in [21], pp. 145–163 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rawlins, K.: (Un)conditionals: an investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures. Ph.D. thesis, UCSC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rawlins, K.: (Un)conditionals. Nat. Lang. Seman. 21, 111–178 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stalnaker, R.C.: A theory of conditionals. In: Harper, W.L., Stalnaker, R., Pearce, G. (eds.) IFS. Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance and Time. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, pp. 41–55. Blackwell, Oxford (1968). doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9117-0_2

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stalnaker, R., Jeffrey, R.: Conditionals as random variables. In: Eells and Skyrms [5], pp. 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, M.: Intervention and the probabilities of indicative conditionals. J. Philos. 112, 477–503 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the organizers of LENLS 12 for the opportunity to present this work. Parts of this material were previously presented at the “Work in Progress” seminar in the Philosophy Department at MIT. I am grateful to the audiences at both events for valuable feedback. Thanks also to Yukinori Takubo and Kyoto University for an invitation to a one-semester guest professorship in the fall of 2015, during which some of this work was carried out.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Kaufmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaufmann, S. (2017). Towards a Probabilistic Analysis for Conditionals and Unconditionals. In: Otake, M., Kurahashi, S., Ota, Y., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10091. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50952-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50953-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics