Skip to main content

Predicting Collective Action from Micro-Blog Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prediction and Inference from Social Networks and Social Media

Abstract

Global and national events in recent years have shown that social media, and particularly micro-blogging services such as Twitter, can be a force for good (e.g., Arab Spring) and harm (e.g., London riots). In both of these examples, social media played a key role in group formation and organisation, and in the coordination of the group’s subsequent collective actions (i.e., the move from rhetoric to action). Surprisingly, despite its clear importance, little is understood about the factors that lead to this kind of group development and the transition to collective action. This paper focuses on an approach to the analysis of data from social media to detect weak signals, i.e., indicators that initially appear at the fringes, but are, in fact, early indicators of such large-scale real-world phenomena. Our approach is in contrast to existing research which focuses on analysing major themes, i.e., the strong signals, prevalent in a social network at a particular point in time. Analysis of weak signals can provide interesting possibilities for forecasting, with online user-generated content being used to identify and anticipate possible offline future events. We demonstrate our approach through analysis of tweets collected during the London riots in 2011 and use of our weak signals to predict tipping points in that context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/05/man-shot-police-london-arrest (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  2. 2.

    http://theguardian.com/uk/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riots-peaceful-protest (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  3. 3.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_Labs (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  4. 4.

    http://sentistrength.wlv.ac.uk/ (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  5. 5.

    http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/ (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  6. 6.

    http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bnc2sampler/sampler.htm (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  7. 7.

    http://theguardian.com/uk/2011/dec/05/anger-police-fuelled-riots-study (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  8. 8.

    http://theguardian.com/uk/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riot-looting-north-london (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  9. 9.

    http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  10. 10.

    http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/claws6tags.html (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

  11. 11.

    http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/USASSemanticTagset.pdf (Accessed: 3/3/2016).

References

  1. Abel F, Hauff C, Houben GJ, Stronkman R, Tao K (2012) Twitcident: fighting fire with information from social web streams. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on world wide web, WWW ’12 companion. ACM, New York, pp 305–308

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Achrekar H, Gandhe A, Lazarus R, Yu SH, Liu B (2011) Predicting flu trends using twitter data. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp 702–707

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlqvist T, Halonen M, Heinonen S (2007) Weak signals in social media. Report on two workshop experiments in futures monitoring. SOMED foresight report, 1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asur S, Huberman BA (2010) Predicting the future with social media. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, WI-IAT ’10. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 492–499

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Baron A, Rayson P (2008) Vard2: a tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. In: Proceedings of the postgraduate conference in Corpus linguistics

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bodendorf F, Kaiser C (2009) Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on social web search and mining, SWSM ’09. ACM, New York, pp 65–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci 2(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castells M (2012) Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press/Wiley, Malden/Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) Libsvm: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2(3):27:1–27:27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charitonidis C, Rashid A, Taylor PJ (2015) Weak signals as predictors of real-world phenomena in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining 2015, ASONAM ’15. ACM, New York, pp 864–871

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Conway M, Doan S, Kawazoe A, Collier N (2009) Classifying disease outbreak reports using n-grams and semantic features. Int J Med Inform 78(12):e47–e58. Mining of Clinical and Biomedical Text and Data Special Issue

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diani M, McAdam D (2003) Social movements and networks: relational approaches to collective action. Comparative politics series. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Forman G (2003) An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J Mach Learn Res 3:1289–1305

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsyth DR (2009) Group dynamics. Cengage Learning, Wadsworth

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Garside R, Smith N (1997) A hybrid grammatical tagger: Claws4. Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora, pp 102–121

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez-Bailon S, Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, Moreno Y (2011) The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci Rep 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00197

  17. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haythornthwaite C (1996) Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Libr Inf Sci Res 18(4):323–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li R, Lei KH, Khadiwala R, Chang KCC (2012) Tedas: a twitter-based event detection and analysis system. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 28th international conference on data engineering (ICDE), pp 1273–1276

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lim SL, Quercia D, Finkelstein A (2010) Stakenet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering, ICSE ’10, vol 1. ACM, New York, pp 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mathioudakis M, Koudas N (2010) Twittermonitor: trend detection over the Twitter stream. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD ’10. ACM, New York, pp 1155–1158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Piao SS, Rayson P, Archer D, McEnery T (2005) Comparing and combining a semantic tagger and a statistical tool for MWE extraction. Comput Speech Lang 19(4):378–397. Special issue on multiword expression

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prentice S, Taylor PJ, Rayson P, Hoskins A, O’Loughlin B (2011) Analyzing the semantic content and persuasive composition of extremist media: a case study of texts produced during the Gaza conflict. Inform Syst Front 13(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prentice S, Rayson P, Taylor PJ (2012) The language of islamic extremism: towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications. Int J Corpus Linguis 17(2):259–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rad AA, Benyoucef M (2011) Towards detecting influential users in social networks. In: International conference on E-technologies. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 227–240

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rashid A, Baron A, Rayson P, May-Chahal C, Greenwood P, Walkerdine J (2013) Who am i? Analyzing digital personas in cybercrime investigations. Computer 46(4):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rayson P (2008) From key words to key semantic domains. Int J Corpus Linguis 13(4):519–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rayson P, Garside R (2000) Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In: Proceedings of the workshop on comparing corpora, WCC ’00. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 1–6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Rayson P, Archer D, Piao S, McEnery A (2004) The UCREL semantic analysis system. In: Proceedings of the beyond named entity recognition semantic labelling for NLP tasks workshop, pp 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2010) Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web, WWW ’10. ACM, New York, pp 851–860

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Sankaranarayanan J, Samet H, Teitler BE, Lieberman MD, Sperling J (2009) Twitterstand: news in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, GIS ’09. ACM, New York, pp 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor PJ, Dando CJ, Ormerod TC, Ball LJ, Jenkins MC, Sandham A, Menacere T (2013) Detecting insider threats to organizations through language change. Law Human Behav 37(4):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G, Cai D, Kappas, A (2010) Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61(12):2544–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G (2011) Sentiment in twitter events. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 62(2):406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang Y, Pedersen JO (1997) A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on machine learning, ICML ’97. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp 412–420

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yu B (2008) An evaluation of text classification methods for literary study. Literary Linguis Comput 23(3):327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our thanks to Dr. Paul Rayson for providing us access to Wmatrix’s web interface and API, and Prof. Mike Thelwall for providing us with the SentiStrength Java version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Charitonidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charitonidis, C., Rashid, A., Taylor, P.J. (2017). Predicting Collective Action from Micro-Blog Data. In: Kawash, J., Agarwal, N., Ă–zyer, T. (eds) Prediction and Inference from Social Networks and Social Media. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51049-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51049-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51048-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51049-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics