Skip to main content

Medical Computational Thinking: Computer Scientific Reasoning in the Medical Curriculum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) in medicine means deliberating when to pursue computer-mediated solutions to medical problems and evaluating when such solutions are worth pursuing in order to assist in medical decision making. Teaching computational thinking (CT) at medical school should be aligned with learning objectives, teaching and assessment methods, and overall pedagogical mission of the individual medical school in relation to society. Medical CT as part of the medical curriculum could help educate novices (medical students and physicians in training) in the analysis and design of complex healthcare organizations, which increasingly rely on computer technology. Such teaching should engage novices in information practices where they learn to perceive practices of computer technology as directly involved in the provision of patient care. However, medical CT as a teaching and research field is only beginning to be established in bioinformatics and has not yet made headway into the medical curriculum. Research is needed to answer questions relating to how, when, and why medical students should learn to engage in CT, e.g., to design technology to solve problems in systemic healthcare and individual patient care. In conclusion, the medical curriculum provides a meaningful problem space in which medical computational thinking ought to be developed. We argue not for the introduction of a stand-alone subject of medical CT, but as researchers, teachers, clinicians, or curriculum administrators, we should strive to develop theoretical arguments and empirical cases about how to integrate the demand for medical CT into the medical curriculum of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and computational thinking. Computer Journal, 55(7), 833–835. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxs074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audet, A.-M., Doty, M. M., Peugh, J., Shamasdin, J., Zapert, K., & Schoenbaum, S. (2004). Information technologies: When will they make it into physicians’ black bags? MedGenMed: Medscape General Medicine, 6(4), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordage, G. (1987). The curriculum: Overloaded and too general? Medical Education, 21(3), 183–188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00689.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, A. M., Louie, A. K., & Roberts, L. W. (2016). Machine learning and the profession of medicine. Jama, 315(6), 551–552. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P. J. (2010). The great principles of computing. American Scientist, 98(5), 369–372. doi:10.1145/948383.948400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, S. U., Alford, R. L., Nelson, E. a., & Potocki, L. (2012). Enhancing exposure to genetics and genomics through an innovative medical school curriculum. Genetics in Medicine, 14(1), 163–167. doi:10.1038/gim.0b013e31822dd7d4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, M., & Marescaux, J. (2015). Robotic surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 102(2), 15–28. doi:10.1002/bjs.9711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R., Tweney, R. D., & Schiavo, M. D. (1979). Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica, 43(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473. doi:10.1080/01421590802108331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, A. S. (2009). Thinking about diagnostic thinking: A 30-year perspective. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(Suppl. 1), 7–18. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9184-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, A. S., Kagan, N., Shulman, L. S., Jason, H., & Loupe, M. J. (1972). Methods and theory in the study of medical inquiry. Journal of Medical Education, 47, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. V., Collier, S., Staniforth, D., & Smith, K. J. (2008). Innovations in curriculum design: a multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 8, 28. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer, J. P. (2010). Teaching clinical reasoning: Case-based and coached. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 85(7), 1118–1124. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, R., Shojania, K. G., & Bates, D. W. (2003). Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(12), 1409–1416. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, L., & Doherty, M. E. (1982). “Pseudodiagnosticity” in an idealized medical problem-solving environment. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, V. R., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Believing is seeing: the influence of a diagnostic hypothesis on the interpretation of clinical features. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 77(Suppl. 10), S67–S69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, R. J. (1998). Requiring students to have computers: Questions for consideration. Academic Medicine, 73(6), 669–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, S. M., & Norman, G. (2013). Diagnostic reasoning: Where we’ve been, where we’re going. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(Suppl. 1), S26–S32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. A., & McGuire, A. L. (2010). The need for medical education reform: genomics and the changing nature of health information. Genome Medicine, 2(3), 18. doi:10.1186/gm139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., & Cohen, T. (2014). In V. L. Patel, D. R. Kaufman, & T. Cohen (Eds.), Cognitive informatics in health and biomedicine. Case studies on critical care complexity and errors. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., & Kannampallil, T. G. (2013). Diagnostic reasoning and decision making in the context of health information technology. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergono, 8, 149–190. doi:10.1177/1557234X13492978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Shortliffe, E. H., Stefanelli, M., Szolovits, P., Berthold, M. R., Bellazzi, R., & Abu-Hanna, A. (2009). The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 46(1), 5–17. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, H. G., White, K. L., & McWhinney, I. R. (2000). Medical education, research, and scientific thinking in the 21st century (part three of three). Education for Health (Abingdon, England), 13(2), 173–186. doi:10.1080/13576280050074435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pevzner, P., & Shamir, R. (2009). Computing has changed biology–biology education must catch up. Science (New York, N.Y.), 325(5940), 541–542. doi:10.1126/science.1173876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualls, J. A., & Sherrell, L. B. (2010). Integrated into the curriculum. JCSC, 25(5), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A., & Chor, B. (2014). Computational thinking in life science education. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(11), e1003897. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortliffe, E., & Blois, M. (2006). The computer meets medicine and biology: emergence of a discipline. Biomedical Informatics, 3–45. doi:10.1007/0-387-36278-9_1.

  • Simpson, J. G., Furnace, J., Crosby, J., Cumming, A. D., Evans, P. A., Friedman Ben David, M., et al. (2002). The Scottish doctor–learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: A foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 136–143. doi:10.1080/01421590220120713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhubl, S. R., Torkamani, A., & Topol, E. J. (2015). Digital medical tools and sensors. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 313(4), 353–354. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.17125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Wing06-ct. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2010). Research notebook: Computational thinking–what and why?. The magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Musaeus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musaeus, P., Tatar, D., Rosen, M. (2017). Medical Computational Thinking: Computer Scientific Reasoning in the Medical Curriculum. In: Rich, P., Hodges, C. (eds) Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52691-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics