Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper considers how persuasive messages – within the healthy eating domain – should be communicated to individuals with different personality types. Following a personality assessment, subjects imagined themselves in a scenario and evaluated the effectiveness of messages constructed using Cialdini’s principles of persuasion. Our results suggest that messages exploiting the principle of authority are the most effective across a range of personality types. In addition, personality had a statistically significant impact on the persuasiveness of messages, with “conscientious” subjects more willing to be persuaded than others. Finally, we found that positively framed messages were more preferred than negatively ones. We also found some interaction effects between personality traits and Cialdini’s principles and framing on persuasiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Scarcity may still be good to use for reminders though.

  2. 2.

    The indirectness was used to avoid effects of participants’ current eating habits.

References

  1. Churchill, S., Good, A., Pavey, L.: Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks. The role of temporal message framing and eating self-efficacy. Appetite 80, 131–136 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo, S.H., Smith, S.G., Taylor, M., Good, A., von Wagner, C.: The effect of temporal framing on behavioral intentions, expectations, and behavior: the case of healthy eating. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 17(3), 202–213 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F., Carofiglio, V.: Portia: a user-adapted persuasion system in the healthy-eating domain. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(6), 42–51 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J.: Group-based recipe recommendations: analysis of data aggregation strategies. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 111–118. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Collins, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masthoff, J., Grasso, F., Ham, J.: Preface to the special issue on personalization and behavior change. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 24(5), 345–350 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., Mandryk, R.L.: Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 24(5), 453–498 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, K.A., Dennis, M., Masthoff, J.: Personalizing reminders to personality for melanoma self-checking. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 85–93 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M.P., Cane, J., Wood, C.E.: The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann. Behav. Med. 46(1), 81–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miceli, M., De Rosis, F.D., Poggi, I.: Emotional and non-emotional persuasion. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20(10), 849–879 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grasso, F.: Rhetorical coding of health promotion dialogues. In: Dojat, M., Keravnou, E.T., Barahona, P. (eds.) AIME 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2780, pp. 179–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39907-0_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grasso, F., Cawsey, A., Jones, R.: Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 53(6), 1077–1115 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaptein, M., Lacroix, J., Saini, P.: Individual differences in persuadability in the health promotion domain. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Personalizing persuasive technologies: explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 38–51 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaptein, M., van Halteren, A.: Adaptive persuasive messaging to increase service retention: using persuasion profiles to increase the effectiveness of email reminders. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(6), 1173–1185 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaptein, M.C., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Persuasion in ambient intelligence. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 1(1), 43–56 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins, E.T.: Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52(12), 1280–1300 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dijkstra, A., Rothman, A., Pietersma, S.: The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychol. Health 26(8), 1036–1048 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Graaf, A., van den Putte, B., de Bruijn, G.J.: Effects of issue involvement and framing of a responsible drinking message on attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J. Health Commun. 20(8), 989–994 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Godinho, C.A., Alvarez, M.J., Lima, M.L.: Emphasizing the losses or the gains: comparing situational and individual moderators of framed messages to promote fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite 96, 416–425 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amazon: Amazon mechanical turk (2016). www.mturk.com. Accessed 30 May 2016

  22. Taylor, W.L.: Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Q. 30, 415–433 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Randolph, J.J.: Free-marginal multirater kappa (multirater k[free]): an alternative to fleiss fixed-marginal multirater Kappa. In: Joensuu Learning and Instruction Symposium 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldberg, L.R.: The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am. Psychol. 48(1), 26–34 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: The quest for validated personality trait stories. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 273–276. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, K.A., Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Tintarev, N.: A method of bootstrapping adapation using personality stories. In progress

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Thomas, R., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Personalising healthy eating messages to age, gender and personality: using Cialdini’s principle’s and framing. In: IUI 2017 Companion. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary Josekutty Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Josekutty Thomas, R., Masthoff, J., Oren, N. (2017). Adapting Healthy Eating Messages to Personality. In: de Vries, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. PERSUASIVE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55133-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55134-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics