Skip to main content

Validation Board: Invalidating Ideas and Discovering the Problems that Must Be Solved

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1440 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 680))

Abstract

Project-Based Learning (PBL) is a teaching method used in many Computer Science courses. To implement it, it is necessary to choose good problems that will drive students’ learning. These problems have to instigate students interest, encourage collaboration and help them to develop their knowledge of course-related topics. This paper presents a case study that sought to verify how the Lean Startup Idea Invalidation process applied with a Validation Board a business strategy assessment tool may assist in the choice of significant problems. Initial results indicate that this method helps students discard bad ideas, improve on the most interesting ones and choose products that are actually used by real users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., Palincsar, A.: Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educ. Psychol. 26(3–4), 369–398 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. R. McNally, Chicago (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Alençon, C.P.P., Müller, C.J.: Modelo de medição de desempenho para startup de saas: um estudo sobre a aplicação do modelo aarrr. Lume/UFRGS 1(1), 1–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gil, A.C.: Estudo de Caso: Fundamentação Científica, Subsídios Para Coleta e Análise de Dados e Como Redigir o Relatório. Atlas, São Paulo (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gomes Filho, A.F.: Modelo de Ensino baseado nos Métodos Ágeis de Desenvolvimento de Software. Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes Filho, A.F., de Resende, C.F.C., Iglesias, C.A.F., Mayworm, J.G., Jardim, M.E.O., Paiva, R.D., de Toledo, R.: Agile software development learning through open hardware project. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop Brasileiro de Métodos Ágeis, pp. 1–8. IEEE, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes Filho, A.F., de Resende, C.F.C., de Toledo, R.: Usando métodos ágeis para ensinar métodos ágeis. In: Anais do 5 Workshop Brasileiro de Métodos Ágeis, pp. 1–12. INPE, São José dos Campos (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., Olkinuora, E.: Project-based learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots. High. Educ. 51(2), 287–314 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herreid, C.F., Schiller, N.A.: Case studies and the flipped classroom. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42(5), 62–66 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235–266 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In: Sternberg, R.J., Zhang, L. (eds.) Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, pp. 227–248. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C.: Project-based learning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 317–334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006). Chap. 19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22(140), 55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mahnic, V.: Teaching scrum through team-project work: students’ perceptions and teacher’s observations. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 26(1), 96–110 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maurya, A.: Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McClure, D.: Validation board. http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2007/06/internet-market.html (2007). Acesso 29 July 2016

  18. Münch, J.: Evolving process simulators by using validated learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 226–227. IEEE Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pompermaier, L., Prikladnicki, R., Cauduro, F.: Startup garagem: Um programa de desenvolvimento de empreendedores. In: Anais da 25 Conferncia ANPROTEC, pp. 1–15. Cuiabá (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stanford University: Problem-based learning. Speaking Teach. 11(1), 1–8 (2001). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22139779

  22. The Startup Machine: Validation board. https://www.leanstartupmachine.com/validationboard/ (2014). Acesso 24 July 2015

  23. Tran, S.T., Le Ngoc Thanh, N.Q.B., Phuong, D.B.: Introduction to information technology. In: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference (CDIO) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avelino F. Gomes Filho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gomes Filho, A.F., Cardoso de Resende, C.F., Gazaneo, P.S., Bittencourt, V., Duarte Paiva, R., de Toledo, R. (2017). Validation Board: Invalidating Ideas and Discovering the Problems that Must Be Solved. In: Silva da Silva, T., Estácio, B., Kroll, J., Mantovani Fontana, R. (eds) Agile Methods. WBMA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 680. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55907-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55907-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55906-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55907-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics