Skip to main content

Toward an Approach to Improve Business Process Models Reuse Based on LinkedIn Social Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 571))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business process (BP) modeling is an important stage in Business Process Management (BPM) lifecycle. However, modeling BP from scratch is fallible task, complex, time-consuming and error prone task. One of the promising solutions to these issues is the reuse of BP models. BP reusability during the BP modeling stage can be very useful since it reduces time and errors modeling, simplify users’ modeling tasks, improve the quality of process models and enhance modeler’s efficiency. The main objective of this paper is to propose a Social BPM approach based on the user social profile to perform the reuse of BP models. We identify the need of exploring user profile to reuse BP models. The LinkedIn social network is used to extract the users’ business interests. These user business interests are then used to recommend the appropriate BP model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lops, P., De Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G., Narducci, F., Musto, C.: Leveraging the LinkedIn social network data for extracting content-based user profiles. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 293–296 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erol, S., Granitzer, M., Happ, S., Jantunen, S., Jennings, P., Johannesson, B., Koschmider, A., Nurcan, S., Rossi, D., Schmidt, R.: Combining BPM and social software: contradiction or chance? J. Softw. Maintenance Evol: Res. Pract. 22, 449–476 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fellmann, M., Koschmider, A., Schoknecht, A.: Analysis of process model reuse literature: are research concepts empirically validated? Decis. Support Syst. 66, 9–19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahzad, K., Elias, M., Johannesson, P.: Towards cross language process model reuse–a language independent representation of process models. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 39, pp. 176–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Derguech, W.: Towards a framework for business process models reuse. College of Engineering & Informatics Research Day, p. 6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laue, R., Becker, M.: Evaluating social tagging for business process models. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) International Conference on Business Process Management. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 132, pp. 280–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S.: BPM and social software. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 649–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Abel, F., Henze, N., Herder, E., Krause, D.: Interweaving public user profiles on the web. In: Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 16–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Elias, M.: Design of business process model repositories: requirements, semantic annotation model and relationship meta-model. Doctoral thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 223 p (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prilla, M.: Models, social tagging and knowledge management - a fruitful combination for process improvement. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 43, pp. 266–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Khider, H., Benna, A.: Social business process management – a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2015), Barcelona, Spain, vol. 3, pp. 340–345 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Markovic, I., Pereira, R.C., Stojanovic, N.: A Framework for Querying in Business Process Modelling, pp. 1703–1714. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ye, M., Liu, X., Lee, W.C.: Exploring social influence for recommendation: a generative model approach. In: Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 671–680 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, S., Krogstie, J.: A repository architecture for business process characterizing models. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 68, pp. 162–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. SAP, A.G.: SAP Business Map (2007). https://www.sap.com

  16. La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J., Dumas, M., Garcia-Banuelos, L.: APROMORE: an advanced process model repository. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(6), 7029–7040 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan, Z., Grefen, P.: A framework for business process model repositories. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 66, pp. 559–570. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Business process model repositories–framework and survey. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(4), 380–395 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhagya, R.P.T., Vasanthapriyan, S., Jayaweera, P.: Survey on requirements and approaches of business process repositories. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 4(1), 236 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shahzad, K., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T., Jayaweera, P., Johannesson, P.: Elicitation of requirements for a business process model repository. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 17, pp. 44–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Wohed, P., Zdravkovic, J., Johannesson, P.. A universal repository for process models. Department of Computers and Systems Science, Stockholm, p. 9 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadjer Khider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khider, H., Benna, A., Meziane, A., Hammoudi, S. (2017). Toward an Approach to Improve Business Process Models Reuse Based on LinkedIn Social Network. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56540-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56541-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics