Skip to main content

Sentiment Propagation for Predicting Reputation Polarity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10193))

Abstract

One of the core tasks of Online Reputation Monitoring is to determine whether a text mentioning the entity of interest has positive or negative implications for its reputation. A challenging aspect of the task is that many texts are polar facts, i.e. they do not convey sentiment but they do have reputational implications (e.g. A Samsung smartphone exploded during flight has negative implications for the reputation of Samsung). In this paper we explore the hypothesis that, in order to determine the reputation polarity of factual information, we can propagate sentiment from sentiment-bearing texts to factual texts that discuss the same issue. We test two approaches that implement such hypothesis: the first one is to directly propagate sentiment to similar texts, and the second one is to augment the polarity lexicon. Our results (i) confirm our propagation hypothesis, with improvements of up to 43% in weakly supervised settings and up to 59% with fully supervised methods; and (ii) indicate that building domain-specific polarity lexicons is a cost-effective strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the rest of the paper we refer to this setting as independent for brevity.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/damiano/learning-similarity-functions-ORM.

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In: LSM 2011, pp. 30–38. ACL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amigó, E., et al.: Overview of RepLab 2013: evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In: Forner, P., Müller, H., Paredes, R., Rosso, P., Stein, B. (eds.) CLEF 2013. LNCS, vol. 8138, pp. 333–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Amigó, E., Corujo, A., Gonzalo, J., Meij, E., de Rijke, M.: Overview of RepLab 2012: evaluating online reputation management systems. In: CLEF 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castellanos, A., Cigarrán, J., García-Serrano, A.: Modelling techniques for Twitter contents: a step beyond classification based approaches. In: CLEF 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(3), 27:1–27:27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Church, K.W., Hanks, P.: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Comput. Linguist. 16(1), 22–29 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerani, S., Carman, M., Crestani, F.: Aggregation methods for proximity-based opinion retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 30(4), 1–36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giachanou, A., Crestani, F.: Like it or not: a survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 49(2), 28 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giachanou, A., Harvey, M., Crestani, F.: Topic-specific stylistic variations for opinion retrieval on Twitter. In: Ferro, N., Crestani, F., Moens, M.-F., Mothe, J., Silvestri, F., Nunzio, G.M., Hauff, C., Silvello, G. (eds.) ECIR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9626, pp. 466–478. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hangya, V., Farkas, R.: Filtering and polarity detection for reputation management on tweets. In: CLEF 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: KDD 2004, pp. 168–177. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Mohammad, S.M.: Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50(1), 723–762 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG! In: ICWSM 2011, pp. 538–541. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In: CAAGET 2010, pp. 26–34. ACL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mosquera, A., Fernández, J., M. Gómez, J., Martínez-Barco, P., Moreda, P.: DLSI-Volvam at RepLab 2013: polarity classification on Twitter data. In: CLEF 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen, F.: A new ANEW: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis of microblogs. In: ESWC 2011 Workshop on ‘Making Sense of Microposts’: Big Things Come in Small Packages, pp. 93–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC 2010, pp. 1320–1326. ELRA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: EMNLP 2002, pp. 79–86. ACL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peetz, M.H., de Rijke, M., Kaptein, R.: Estimating reputation polarity on microblog posts. Inf. Process. Manag. 52(2), 193–216 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perez-Rosas, V., Banea, C., Mihalcea, R.: Learning sentiment lexicons in Spanish. In: LREC 2012. ELRA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saias, J.: In search of reputation assessment: experiences with polarity classification in RepLab 2013. In: CLEF 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spina, D., Gonzalo, J., Amigó, E.: Learning similarity functions for topic detection in online reputation monitoring. In: SIGIR 2014, pp. 527–536. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 37(2), 267–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turney, P.D.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: ACL 2002, pp. 417–424. ACL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: HLT 2005, pp. 347–354. ACL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under the project OpiTrack.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Giachanou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giachanou, A., Gonzalo, J., Mele, I., Crestani, F. (2017). Sentiment Propagation for Predicting Reputation Polarity. In: Jose, J., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56607-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56608-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics