Abstract
In this paper, we choose to compare four methods for controlling particle position when it violates the search space boundaries and the impact on the performance of Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO). The methods are: hard borders, soft borders, random position and spherical universe. The goal is to compare the performance of these methods for the classical version of PSO and popular modification – the Attractive and Repulsive Particle Swarm Optimization (ARPSO). The experiments were carried out according to CEC benchmark rules and statistically evaluated.
T. Kadavy—This work was supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic – GACR P103/15/06700S, further by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Programme Project no. LO1303 (MSMT-7778/2014). Also by the European Regional Development Fund under the Project CEBIA-Tech no. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0089 and by Internal Grant Agency of Tomas Bata University under the Projects no. IGA/CebiaTech/2017/004.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)
Nepomuceno, F.V., Engelbrecht, A.P.: A self-adaptive heterogeneous PSO for real-parameter optimization. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 361–368. IEEE (2013)
Zhan, Z.-H., et al.: Orthogonal learning particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 15(6), 832–847 (2011)
Riget, J., Vesterstrom, J.S.: A diversity-guided particle swarm optimizer-the ARPSO. Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, Technical report 2002–02 (2002)
Chen, Q., et al.: Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for CEC 2015 special session on bound constrained single-objective computationally expensive numerical optimization
Kennedy, J.: The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 303–308 (1997)
Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y.: Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2000, pp. 84–88. IEEE (2000)
Friedman, M.: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32, 675–701 (1937)
Demsar, J.: Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 1–30 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kadavy, T., Pluhacek, M., Viktorin, A., Senkerik, R. (2017). Comparing Strategies for Search Space Boundaries Violation in PSO. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L., Zurada, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10246. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59060-8_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59060-8_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59059-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59060-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)