Skip to main content

Metrics and the Cooperative Process of the Self-organizing Map Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2017 (ISNN 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10261))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2391 Accesses

Abstract

This paper explores effects of using different the distance measures in the cooperative process of the Self-Organizing Map algorithm on the resulting map. In standard implementations of the algorithm, Euclidean distance is normally used. However, experimentation with non-Euclidean metrics shows that this is not the only metric that works. For example, versions of the SOM algorithm using the Manhattan metric, and metrics in the same family as the Euclidean metric, can converge, producing sets of weight vectors indistinguishable from the regular SOM algorithm. However, just being a metric is not enough: two examples of such are described. Being analogous to the Euclidean metric is not enough either, and we exhibit members of a family of such distance measures that do not produce satisfactory maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haykin, S.: Neural Networks and Learning Machines. Prentice-Hall, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, F., Berry, H., Schoenauer, M.: The impact of network topology on self-organizing maps. In: Proceedings of First ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GEC-2009, pp. 247–254. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43, 59–69 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Płoński, P., Zaremba, K.: Improving performance of self-organising maps with distance metric learning method. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7267, pp. 169–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29347-4_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin, H., Allison, N.M.: On the distribution and convergence of feature space in self-organizing maps. Neural Comput. 7, 1178–1187 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William H. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilson, W.H. (2017). Metrics and the Cooperative Process of the Self-organizing Map Algorithm. In: Cong, F., Leung, A., Wei, Q. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2017. ISNN 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59072-1_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59072-1_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59071-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59072-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics