Skip to main content

Using Argumentation Schemes for a Persuasive Cognitive Assistant System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies (EUMAS 2016, AT 2016)

Abstract

The iGenda framework is a cognitive assistant that helps care-receivers and caregivers in the management of their agendas. One of the problems detected in systems of this kind is the lack of user engagement. This engagement can be improved through the application of persuasion techniques in order to convince users to act in a specific way. According to this, this paper presents a new architecture that will allow the system to select and recommend activities that potentially best suits to the users’ interests based on argumentation techniques.

A. Costa thanks the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) the Post-Doc scholarship with the Ref. SFRH/BPD/102696/2014 and COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 project. This work is also supported by the projects TIN2015-65515-C4-1-R and TIN2014-55206-R of the Spanish government and by the grant program for the recruitment of doctors for the Spanish system of science and technology (PAID-10-14) of the Universitat Politècnica de València.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun. 7(1), 39–59 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bigi, S.: Healthy reasoning: the role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients’ self-management abilities in chronic care. Active Ageing Healthy Living: Hum. Cent. Approach Res. Innov. Source Qual. Life 203, 193 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chao, S.F.: Changes in leisure activities and dimensions of depressive symptoms in later life: a 12-year follow-up. Gerontol. 56(3), 397–407 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A.G., González, M.P.: Empowering recommendation technologies through argumentation. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 403–422. Springer Science + Business Media, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, A., Heras, S., Palanca, J., Novais, P., Julián, V.: A persuasive cognitive assistant system. In: Lindgren, H., et al. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence- Software and Applications- 7th International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (ISAmI 2016). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 476. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Costa, A., Novais, P., Simoes, R.: A caregiver support platform within the scope of an ambient assisted living ecosystem. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 14(3), 5654–5676 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummings, L.: Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos: http://www.pordata.pt/

  9. Green, N.: Implementing argumentation schemes as logic programs. In: The 16th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heras, S., Botti, V., Julián, V.: Argument-based agreements in agent societies. Neurocomputing 75(1), 156–162 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter, A., Williams, M.: Aggregation of clinical evidence using argumentation: a tutorial introduction. In: Hommersom, A., Lucas, P.J.F. (eds.) Foundations of Biomedical Knowledge Representation. LNCS, vol. 9521, pp. 317–337. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28007-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jordán, J., Heras, S., Valero, S., Julian, V.: An infrastructure for argumentative agents. Comput. Intell. 31(3), 418–441 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Marsh, S., Dibben, M.R.: Trust, untrust, distrust and mistrust - an exploration of the dark(er) side. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S. (eds.) iTrust 2005. LNCS, vol. 3477, pp. 17–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11429760_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Staff, C.: Recommendation algorithms, online privacy, and more. Commun. ACM 52(5), 10 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stella Heras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costa, Â., Heras, S., Palanca, J., Jordán, J., Novais, P., Julian, V. (2017). Using Argumentation Schemes for a Persuasive Cognitive Assistant System. In: Criado Pacheco, N., Carrascosa, C., Osman, N., Julián Inglada, V. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies. EUMAS AT 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59293-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59294-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics