Skip to main content

Robots Autonomy: Some Technical Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Imbuing a robot with decisional autonomy raises many technical issues that must be dealt with in order to let the robots out of the labs. In the framework of a shared authority between the robot itself and a human being, what is at stake is to mitigate the weaknesses of both agents (i.e., the robot and the human) through appropriate control handovers. This chapter focuses on autonomy technical issues, on some human weak spots when interacting with a robot, and on the human-robot interaction issues. Moreover a section focuses on some ethical challenges that are raised by autonomy. The conclusion shows that many questions have to be answered through research and technical work so as to make sure that robots and autonomous machines will be beneficial for society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ricoeur (1990) defines ethics as compared to morality in so far as morality states what is compulsory or prohibited whereas ethics assesses what is fair and what is not in a given situation.

References

  • (Bonnemains et al. 2016) Bonnemains V, Saurel Cl, Tessier C (2016) How ethical frameworks answer to ethical dilemmas: towards a formal model. In: ECAI'16 Workshop "Ethics in the design of Intelligent Agents (EDIA'16)", The Hague, The Netherlands, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1668/paper8.pdf

  • (Bringsjord 2015) Bringsjord S (2015) 'Ethical AI' could have thwarted deadly crash. In: timesunion 4 April 2015 http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-opinion/article/Ethical-AI-could-have-thwarted-deadly-crash-6179225.php

  • (Castelfranchi and Falcone 2003) Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2003) From automaticity to autonomy: the frontier of artificial agents. In: Agent Autonomy, Hexmoor H, Castelfranchi C and Falcone R editors, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • (CERNA 2014) Commission de réflexion sur l'Éthique de la Recherche en sciences et technologies du Numérique d’Allistene (2014) Éthique de la recherche en robotique, rapport n°1 de la CERNA. In French

    Google Scholar 

  • (Coleman 2001) Coleman KG (2001) Android arete: towards a virtue ethic for computational agents. Ethics and Information Technology 3:247-265

    Google Scholar 

  • (Collart et al. 2015) Collart J, Gateau Th, Fabre E, Tessier C (2015) Human-robot systems facing ethical conflicts: a preliminary experimental protocol, In: AAAI 2015 Workshop on AI and Ethics, Austin Texas USA

    Google Scholar 

  • (Cummings 2006) Cummings ML (2006) Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. Journal of Technology Studies 32(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • (Defense Science Board 2012) Department of Defense, Defense Science Board (2012) Task Force Report: The role of autonomy in DoD systems

    Google Scholar 

  • (Defense Science Board 2016) Department of Defense, Defense Science Board (2016) Summer study on autonomy

    Google Scholar 

  • (Franklin and Graesser 1997) Franklin S, Graesser A (1997) Is it an agent or just a program? A taxononomy for autonomous agents. In: ECAI’96 workshop ATAL, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • (Grinbaum et al. 2017) Grinbaum A, Chatila R, Devillers L, Ganascia J-G, Tessier C, Dauchet M (2017) Ethics in robotics research: CERNA recommendations. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, January. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2611586

  • (Laumond 2012) Laumond J-P .(2012) La robotique : une récidive d’Héphaïstos. Leçon inaugurale prononcée au Collège de France. In French

    Google Scholar 

  • (Lin et al. 2012) Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA editors (2012) Robot Ethics - The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • (MIT) MIT. Moral Machine, http://moralmachine.mit.edu/

  • (Murphy and Woods 2009) Murphy RR, Woods DD (2009) Beyond Asimov: the three laws of responsible robotics. IEEE Intelligent Systems Human centered computing, July-Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • (Pizziol 2013) Pizziol S. (2013) Conflict prediction in human-machine systems. Doctoral thesis University of Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  • (Pizziol et al. 2014) Pizziol S, Tessier C, Dehais Fr (2014) Petri net-based modelling of human–automation conflicts in aviation, Ergonomics DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.877597

  • (Regis et al. 2014) Regis N, Dehais Fr, Rachelson E, Thooris Ch, Pizziol S, Causse M, Tessier C (2014) Formal Detection of Attentional Tunneling in Human Operator-Automation Interactions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 44(3):326-336

    Google Scholar 

  • (Ricoeur 1990) Ricoeur P (1990) Ethique et morale. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 4(1):5–17. In French

    Google Scholar 

  • (Sullins 2010) Sullins JP (2010) RoboWarfare: can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield? Ethics and Information Technology 12(3):263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • (Sarter et al.1997) Sarter ND, Woods DD, Billings CE (1997) Automation surprises. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd ed., Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • (Tessier and Dehais 2012) Tessier C, Dehais Fr (2012) Authority management and conflict solving in human-machine systems. Aerospace-Lab, The Onera Journal 4. http://www.aerospacelab-journal.org/al4/authority-management-and-conflict-solving

  • (Truszkowski et al. 2010) Truszkowski W, Hallock H, Rouff C, Karlin J, Rash J, Hinchey M, Sterritt R (2010) Autonomous and autonomic systems with applications to NASA intelligent spacecraft operations and exploration systems. In: NASA Monographs in Systems and Software Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • (Tzafestas 2016) Tzafestas SG (2016) Roboethics - A Navigating Overview. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • (Wallach and Allen 2009) Wallach W, Allen C (2009) Moral Machines - Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is an updated translation of: Tessier C (2015) Autonomie: enjeux techniques et perspectives. Drones et killer robots: faut-il les interdire? Doaré R, Danet D, de Boisboissel G editors. Presses Universitaires de Rennes. In French.

The last part on Autonomy and authority sharing ethical challenges is an updated translation of the corresponding part in: Tessier C (2016) Conception et usage des robots: quelques questions éthiques. Techniques de l’Ingénieur S7900 V1. In French.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Tessier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tessier, C. (2017). Robots Autonomy: Some Technical Issues. In: Lawless, W., Mittu, R., Sofge, D., Russell, S. (eds) Autonomy and Artificial Intelligence: A Threat or Savior?. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59719-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59719-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59718-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59719-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics