Skip to main content

Automatic Classification of Radiological Reports for Clinical Care

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2017)

Abstract

Radiological reporting generates a large amount of free-text clinical narrative, a potentially valuable source of information for improving clinical care and supporting research. The use of automatic techniques to analyze such reports is necessary to make their content effectively available to radiologists in an aggregated form. In this paper we focus on the classification of chest computed tomography reports according to a classification schema proposed by radiologists of the Italian hospital ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia. At the time of writing, 346 reports have been annotated by a radiologist. Each report is classified according to the schema developed by radiologists and textual evidences are marked in the report. The annotations are then used to train different machine learning based classifiers. We present in this paper a method based on a cascade of classifiers which make use of a set of syntactic and semantic features. By testing the classifiers in cross-validation on manually annotated reports, we obtained a range of accuracy of 81–96%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The list of synonyms and their preferred term has been built manually.

References

  1. Attardi, G., Cozza, V., Sartiano, D.: Annotation and extraction of relations from Italian medical records. In: Proceedings of the 6th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop (IIR 2015) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Esuli, A., Marcheggiani, D., Sebastiani, F.: An enhanced CRFs-based system for information extraction from radiology reports. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(3), 425–435 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Mach. Learn. 29(2–3), 131–163 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Garla, V., Taylor, C., Brandt, C.: Semi-supervised clinical text classification with laplacian SVMs: an application to cancer case management. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(5), 869–875 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Girardi, C., Bentivogli, L., Farajian, M.A., Federico, M.: MT-EQuAl: a toolkit for human assessment of machine translation output. In: COLING 2014, 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference System Demonstrations, 23–29 August 2014, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 120–123 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (Volume 1), ICDAR 1995, vol. 1, p. 278. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kudo, T., Matsumoto, Y.: Fast methods for kernel-based text analysis. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2003, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, vol. 1, pp. 24–31 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pianta, E., Girardi, C., Zanoli, R.: The TextPro tool suite. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pons, E., Braun, L.M.M., Hunink, M.G.M., Kors, J.A.: Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 279(2), 329–343 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rokach, L., Maimon, O.: Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications. World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., River Edge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yetisgen-Yildiz, M., Gunn, M.L., Xia, F., Payne, T.H.: A text processing pipeline to extract recommendations from radiology reports. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(2), 354–362 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper has been partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number CR30I1_162758, and by the University of Brescia with the H&W SmartService project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Lyse Minard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerevini, A.E. et al. (2017). Automatic Classification of Radiological Reports for Clinical Care. In: ten Teije, A., Popow, C., Holmes, J., Sacchi, L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59757-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59758-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics