Skip to main content

Preserving Local Differential Privacy in Online Social Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (WASA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10251))

Abstract

Following the trend of Online Social Networks (OSNs) data sharing and publishing, researchers raise their concern about the privacy problem. Differential privacy is such a mechanism to anonymize sensitive data. It deploys graph abstraction models, such as the Hierarchical Random Graph (HRG) model, to extract graph features. However, the injected noise amount, determined by the sensitivity, is usually proportion to the size of the whole network. Therefore, achieving global differential privacy may harm the utility of the releasing graphs.

In this paper, we define the notion of group-based local differential privacy. In particular, by splitting the network into 1-neighborhood graphs and applying HRG-based methods, our scheme reduces the noise scale on local graphs when achieving differential privacy. By deploying the grouping algorithm, our scheme focuses on anonymizing similar users. The experiment results show that our scheme could preserve more utility than the global scheme under the same privacy level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: De-anonymizing social networks. In: 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 173–187. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ji, S., Li, W., Mittal, P., Hu, X., Beyah, R.: SecGraph: a uniform and open-source evaluation system for graph data anonymization and de-anonymization. In: Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, B., Pei, J.: Preserving privacy in social networks against neighborhood attacks. In: IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2008, pp. 506–515. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zou, L., Chen, L., Tamer Özsu, M.: K-automorphism: a general framework for privacy preserving network publication. Proc. VLDB Endowment 2(1), 946–957 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dwork, C.: Differential privacy. In: van Tilborg, H.C.A., Jajodia, S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, pp. 338–340. Springer, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, R., Acs, G., Castelluccia, C.: Differentially private sequential data publication via variable-length n-grams. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 638–649. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sala, A., Zhao, X., Wilson, C., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.Y.: Sharing graphs using differentially private graph models. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 81–98. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, Q., Chen, R., Tan, K.-L.: Differentially private network data release via structural inference. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 911–920. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boppana, R., Halldórsson, M.M.: Approximating maximum independent sets by excluding subgraphs. BIT Numer. Math. 32(2), 180–196 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leskovec, J., Krevl, A.: SNAP datasets: Stanford large network dataset collection, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clauset, A., Moore, C., Newman, M.E.J.: Structural inference of hierarchies in networks. In: Airoldi, E., Blei, D.M., Fienberg, S.E., Goldenberg, A., Xing, E.P., Zheng, A.X. (eds.) ICML 2006. LNCS, vol. 4503, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73133-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tianchong Gao or Feng Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gao, T., Li, F., Chen, Y., Zou, X. (2017). Preserving Local Differential Privacy in Online Social Networks. In: Ma, L., Khreishah, A., Zhang, Y., Yan, M. (eds) Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications. WASA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60033-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60033-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60032-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60033-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics