Skip to main content

A Gold Standards-Based Crowd Label Aggregation Within the Belief Function Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10351))

Abstract

Crowdsourcing, in particular microtasking is now a powerful concept used by employers in order to obtain answers on tasks hardly handled by automated computation. These answers are provided by human employees and then combined to get a final answer. Nevertheless, the quality of participants in microtasking platforms is often heterogeneous which makes results imperfect and thus not fully reliable. To tackle this problem, we propose a new approach of label aggregation based on gold standards under the belief function theory. This latter provides several tools able to represent and even combine imperfect information. Experiments conducted on both simulated and real world datasets show that our approach improves results quality even with a high ratio of bad workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magaz. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jousselme, A.-L., Grenier, D., Bossé, É.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf. Fusion 2, 91–101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lefèvre, E., Elouedi, Z.: How to preserve the confict as an alarm in the combination of belief functions? Decis. Support Syst. 56, 326–333 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(5), 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, K., Caverlee, J., Webb, S.: The social honeypot project: protecting online communities from spammers. In: International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1139–1140 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abassi, L., Boukhris, I.: Crowd label aggregation under a belief function framework. In: Lehner, F., Fteimi, N. (eds.) KSEM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9983, pp. 185–196. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawid, A.P., Skene, A.M.: Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the EM algorithm. Appl. Stat. 28, 20–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khattak, F.K., Salleb, A.: Quality control of crowd labeling through expert evaluation. In: The Neural Information Processing Systems 2nd Workshop on Computational Social Science and the Wisdom of Crowds, pp. 27–29 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smets, P., Mamdani, A., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Non Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning, pp. 253–286. Academic Press, London (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Trabelsi, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefèvre, E.: Belief function combination: comparative study within the classifier fusion framework. In: Gaber, T., Hassanien, A.E., El-Bendary, N., Dey, N. (eds.) AISI 2015. AISC, vol. 407, pp. 425–435. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26690-9_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Karger, D., Oh, S., Shah, D.: Iterative learning for reliable crowdsourcing systems. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1953–1961 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ben Rjab, A., Kharoune, M., Miklos, Z., Martin, A.: Characterization of experts in crowdsourcing platforms. In: Vejnarová, J., Kratochvíl, V. (eds.) BELIEF 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9861, pp. 97–104. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Welinder, P., Branson, S., Perona, P., Belongie, S.: The multidimensional wisdom of crowds. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2424–2432 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank, A.: UCI machine learning repository (1987). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  17. Whitehill, J., Wu, T., Bergsma, J., Movellan, R.J., Ruvolo, P.L.: Whose vote should count more: optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2035–2043 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Abassi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abassi, L., Boukhris, I. (2017). A Gold Standards-Based Crowd Label Aggregation Within the Belief Function Theory. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60045-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60045-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60044-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60045-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics