Skip to main content

Ideology Detection for Twitter Users via Link Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10354))

Abstract

The problem of ideology detection is to study the latent (political) placement for people, which is traditionally studied on politicians according to their voting behaviors. Recently, more and more studies begin to address the ideology detection problem for ordinary users based on their online behaviors that can be captured by social media, e.g., Twitter. As far as we are concerned, the vast majority of the existing methods on ideology detection on social media have oversimplified the problem as a binary classification problem (i.e., liberal vs. conservative). Moreover, though social links can play a critical role in deciding one’s ideology, most of the existing work ignores the heterogeneous types of links in social media. In this paper we propose to detect numerical ideology positions for Twitter users, according to their follow, mention, and retweet links to a selected set of politicians. A unified probabilistic model is proposed that can (1) integrate heterogeneous types of links together in determining people’s ideology, and (2) automatically learn the quality of each type of links in deciding one’s ideology. Experiments have demonstrated the advantages of our model in terms of both ranking and political leaning classification accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to API limits, only the most recent 3,200 tweets for each user are available.

  2. 2.

    Source: http://www.mondotimes.com/newspapers/usa/usatop100.html.

References

  1. Barberá, P.: Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Polit. Anal. 23(1), 76–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinton, J., Jackman, S., Rivers, D.: The statistical analysis of roll call data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98(02), 355–370 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerrish, S., Blei, D.M.: Predicting legislative roll calls from text. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2011), pp. 489–496 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gerrish, S., Blei, D.M.: How they vote: issue-adjusted models of legislative behavior. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2012), pp. 2762–2770 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golbeck, J., Hansen, D.: Computing political preference among Twitter followers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors, Computing Systems, pp. 1105–1108 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gu, Y., Sun, Y., Jiang, N., Wang, B., Chen, T.: Topic-factorized ideal point estimation model for legislative voting network. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2014), pp. 183–192 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heckman, J.J., Snyder Jr., J.M.: Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND J. Econ. 28, S142–S189 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iyyer, M., Enns, P., Boyd-Graber, J., Resnik, P.: Political ideology detection using recursive neural networks. In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jackman, S.: Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via bayesian simulation: identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Polit. Anal. 9(3), 227–241 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Londregan, J.: Estimating legislators’ preferred points. Polit. Anal. 8(1), 35–56 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, V.-A., Boyd-Graber, J., Resnik, P., Miler, K.: Tea party in the house: a hierarchical ideal point topic model and its application to republican legislators in the 112th congress. In: Proceedings of ACL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 29, 357–384 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: Patterns of congressional voting. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 35(1), 228–278 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wong, F., Tan, C., Sen, S., Chiang, M.: Quantifying political leaning from tweets and retweets. In: ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wong, F., Tan, C., Sen, S., Chiang, M.: Media, pundits and the us presidential election: quantifying political leanings from tweets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yupeng Gu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gu, Y., Chen, T., Sun, Y., Wang, B. (2017). Ideology Detection for Twitter Users via Link Analysis. In: Lee, D., Lin, YR., Osgood, N., Thomson, R. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60239-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60240-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics