Skip to main content

A Rough View on Incomplete Information in Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets (IJCRS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10313))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1092 Accesses

Abstract

In both game theory and in rough sets, the management of missing and contradicting information is regarded as one of the biggest challenges with significant practical relevance. In game theory, a distinction is made between imperfect and incomplete information. Imperfect information is defined when a player cannot identify the decision node it is presently at. Incomplete information refers to a lack of knowledge about the future actions of one’s opponent, e.g., due to missing information about its payoffs. In rough set theory, missing and contradicting information in decision tables has been extensively researched and has led to the definition of lower and upper approximations of sets. Although game theory and rough sets have already addressed missing and contradicting information thoroughly little attention has been given to their relationship. In the paper, we present an example how games with imperfect information can be interpreted in the context of rough sets. In particular, we further detail Peters’ recently proposed mapping of a game with incomplete information on a rough decision table.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Entire’ in a sense of the minimum game as depicted in Table 1.

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A.: The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84(3), 488–500 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K.R., Grädel, E. (eds.): Lectures in Game Theory for Computer Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Grzymala-Busse, J.: Rough set theory with applications to data mining. In: Negoita, M.G., Reusch, B. (eds.) Real World Applications of Computational Intelligence. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 179, pp. 221–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11364160_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Halpern, J.Y.: Computer science and game theory: a brief survey (2007). arXiv preprint: arXiv:cs/0703148

  6. Hammerstein, P., Selten, R.: Game theory and evolutionary biology. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 2, pp. 929–993. Elsevier (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harsanyi, J.C.: Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Manag. Sci. 14, 159–183 (Part I), 320–334 (Part II), 486–502 (Part III) (1967/1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbert, J.P., Yao, J.T.: Game-theoretic risk analysis in decision-theoretic rough sets. In: Wang, G., Li, T., Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Miao, D., Skowron, A., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSKT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5009, pp. 132–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79721-0_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Herbert, J.P., Yao, J.T.: Game-theoretic rough sets. Fundam. Inform. 108(3–4), 267–286 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreps, D.M.: Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Morrow, J.D.: Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Peters, G.: A rough perspective on information in extensive form games. In: Flores, V., et al. (eds.) IJCRS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9920, pp. 145–154. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47160-0_13

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tirole, J.: The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, B., Li, R., Perrizo, W.: Big Data Analytics in Bioinformatics and Healthcare. IGI Global, Hershey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, J., Miao, D.: Analysis on attribute reduction strategies of rough set. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 13(2), 189–192 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, J., Yao, L.: A class of two-person zero-sum matrix games with rough payoffs. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2010, Article ID 404792, 22 p. (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/404792

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Peters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peters, G. (2017). A Rough View on Incomplete Information in Games. In: Polkowski, L., et al. Rough Sets. IJCRS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60837-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60837-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60836-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60837-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics