Abstract
In both game theory and in rough sets, the management of missing and contradicting information is regarded as one of the biggest challenges with significant practical relevance. In game theory, a distinction is made between imperfect and incomplete information. Imperfect information is defined when a player cannot identify the decision node it is presently at. Incomplete information refers to a lack of knowledge about the future actions of one’s opponent, e.g., due to missing information about its payoffs. In rough set theory, missing and contradicting information in decision tables has been extensively researched and has led to the definition of lower and upper approximations of sets. Although game theory and rough sets have already addressed missing and contradicting information thoroughly little attention has been given to their relationship. In the paper, we present an example how games with imperfect information can be interpreted in the context of rough sets. In particular, we further detail Peters’ recently proposed mapping of a game with incomplete information on a rough decision table.
Notes
- 1.
‘Entire’ in a sense of the minimum game as depicted in Table 1.
References
Akerlof, G.A.: The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84(3), 488–500 (1970)
Apt, K.R., Grädel, E. (eds.): Lectures in Game Theory for Computer Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
Grzymala-Busse, J.: Rough set theory with applications to data mining. In: Negoita, M.G., Reusch, B. (eds.) Real World Applications of Computational Intelligence. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 179, pp. 221–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11364160_7
Halpern, J.Y.: Computer science and game theory: a brief survey (2007). arXiv preprint: arXiv:cs/0703148
Hammerstein, P., Selten, R.: Game theory and evolutionary biology. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 2, pp. 929–993. Elsevier (1994)
Harsanyi, J.C.: Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Manag. Sci. 14, 159–183 (Part I), 320–334 (Part II), 486–502 (Part III) (1967/1968)
Herbert, J.P., Yao, J.T.: Game-theoretic risk analysis in decision-theoretic rough sets. In: Wang, G., Li, T., Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Miao, D., Skowron, A., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSKT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5009, pp. 132–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79721-0_22
Herbert, J.P., Yao, J.T.: Game-theoretic rough sets. Fundam. Inform. 108(3–4), 267–286 (2011)
Kreps, D.M.: Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)
Morrow, J.D.: Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)
Peters, G.: A rough perspective on information in extensive form games. In: Flores, V., et al. (eds.) IJCRS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9920, pp. 145–154. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47160-0_13
Tirole, J.: The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)
Wang, B., Li, R., Perrizo, W.: Big Data Analytics in Bioinformatics and Healthcare. IGI Global, Hershey (2014)
Wang, J., Miao, D.: Analysis on attribute reduction strategies of rough set. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 13(2), 189–192 (1998)
Xu, J., Yao, L.: A class of two-person zero-sum matrix games with rough payoffs. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2010, Article ID 404792, 22 p. (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/404792
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Peters, G. (2017). A Rough View on Incomplete Information in Games. In: Polkowski, L., et al. Rough Sets. IJCRS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60837-2_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60837-2_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60836-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60837-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)