Skip to main content

Evaluation of Scientific Production Without Using Bibliometric Indicators: Decision-Making on a Priori Criteria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: In the Tradition of Herbert A. Simon's Heritage (DCAI 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 618))

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

The present contribution contains the formalisation of a method (not based on bibliometric indicators) for assigning analytical scores to the scientific production of researchers who challenge in an open competitive exam in a Socioeconomic Scientific Sector. The preliminary decisions of the evaluation board are described subdividing them into six decision steps. The role of decision-making about a priori criteria is pointed out in relation to the respect of the researcher’s identity and of the spontaneous evolution of science. In this work, also an example of application is proposed to the evaluation board. Some algebraic implications are highlighted and it is suggested to reflect on the usefulness of the rules of Boole’s Algebra for the calculation of total scores deriving from the simultaneous application of criteria having different logical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Archambault, E., Gagné, É.V.: The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities. (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC)). Science-Metrix, Quebec (2004). http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2004_008_SSHRC_Bibliometrics_Social_Science.pdf

  2. Bana e Costa, C.A., Oliveira, M.D.: A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation. Omega 40(4), 424–436 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahler-Larsen, P.: The Evaluation Society. Stanford University Press (2012). http://www.amazon.com/The-Evaluation-Society-Peter-Dahler-Larsen/dp/080477692X

  4. De Bruin, R.E., Kint, A., Luwel, M., Moed, H.F.: A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent. Res. Eval. 3(1), 25–41 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B., Spruyt, E.H.J.: Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics 93(2), 373–390 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gantman, E.R.: Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries. Scientometrics 93(3), 967–985 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0736-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J.C., Aleixandre-Benavent, R.: The impact factor in non-english-speaking countries. Scientometrics 92(2), 297–311 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0692-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., Rafols, I.: Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015). http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinto, M.J., Fernandes, S.: New questions arise: are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the Social Sciences and Humanities? Qual. Quant. Method Libr. Spec. Issue Bibliometr. Scientometr. 161–169 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ministry of Education, University and Research of Italy: Ministerial Decree 11th May 2011, n. 243 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G., Van Raan, A.F.J.: The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Res. Policy 14, 131–149 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nederhof, A.J.: Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics 66(1), 81–100 (2006). doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Raan, A.F.J.: Scientometrics: state-of-the-art. Scientometrics 38(1), 205–218 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zitt, M.: Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators. Meas. Interdisc. Res. Perspect. 3(1), 38–49 (2005). doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0301_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Pagliari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pagliari, C., Mattoscio, N. (2018). Evaluation of Scientific Production Without Using Bibliometric Indicators: Decision-Making on a Priori Criteria. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J. (eds) Decision Economics: In the Tradition of Herbert A. Simon's Heritage. DCAI 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60882-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60882-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60881-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60882-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics