Skip to main content

An Improved Lower Bound on the Growth Constant of Polyiamonds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computing and Combinatorics (COCOON 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10392))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A polyiamond is an edge-connected set of cells on the triangular lattice. In this paper we provide an improved lower bound on the asymptotic growth constant of polyiamonds, proving that it is at least 2.8424. The proof of the new bound is based on a concatenation argument and on elementary calculus. We also suggest a nontrivial extension of this method for improving the bound further. However, the proposed extension is based on an unproven (yet very reasonable) assumption.

Work on this paper by all authors has been supported in part by ISF Grant 575/15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that in this reference the lattice is called “honeycomb” (hexagonal) and the terms should be doubled. The reason for this is that the authors actually count clusters of vertices on the hexagonal lattice, whose connectivity is the same as that of cells on the triangular lattice, with no distinction between the two possible orientations of the latter cells. This is why polyiamonds are often regarded in the literature as site animals on the hexagonal lattice, and polyhexes (cell animals on the hexagonal lattice) are regarded as site animals on the triangular lattice, which sometimes causes confusion.

  2. 2.

    This easy upper bound, based on an idea of Eden [7] was described by Lunnon [15, p. 98]. Every polyiamond P can be built according to a set of \(n{-}1\) “instructions” taken from a superset of size \(2(n-1)\). Each instruction tells us how to choose a lattice cell c, neighboring a cell already in P, and add c to P. (Some of these instruction sets are illegal, and some other sets produce the same polyiamonds, but this only helps.) Hence, \(\lambda _T \le \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty } \left( {\begin{array}{c}2(n-1)\\ n-1\end{array}}\right) ^{1/n} = 4\).

  3. 3.

    We wonder why Rands and Welsh did not use \(T(22) = 1,456,891,547\) (which was also available in their reference [19]) to show that \(\lambda _T \ge (T(22)/10)^{1/22} \approx 2.3500\).

  4. 4.

    \(T(75)=15,936,363,137,225,733,301,433,441,827,683,823\).

  5. 5.

    In fact, it is widely believed (but not proven) that the constant \(\theta \) is common to all lattices in the same dimension. In particular, there is evidence that \(\theta = 1\) for all lattices in two dimensions.

  6. 6.

    Madras [16, Proposition 4.2] proved “almost monotonicity” for all lattices, namely, that \(L(n+2)/L(n) \ge (L(n+1)/L(n))^2 - \varGamma _\mathcal{L}/n\) for all sufficiently large values of n, where \(\varGamma _\mathcal{L}\) is a constant which depends on \(\mathcal{L}\). Note that if \(\varGamma _\mathcal{L}= 0\), then we have \(L(n+2)/L(n+1) \ge L(n+1)/L(n)\), i.e., that the ratio sequence of \(\mathcal{L}\) is monotone increasing.

References

  1. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. http://oeis.org

  2. The Open Problems Project. http://cs.smith.edu/~orourke/TOPP/

  3. Aleksandrowicz, G., Barequet, G.: Counting \(d\)-dimensional polycubes and nonrectangular planar polyominoes. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl. 19, 215–229 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barequet, G., Rote, G., Shalah, M.: \(\lambda \, > \, 4\): an improved lower bound on the growth constant of polyominoes. Comm. ACM 59, 88–95 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barequet, G., Shalah, M.: Improved bounds on the growth constant of polyiamonds. In: Proceedings of the 32nd European Workshop on Computational Geometry, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 67–70, March-April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broadbent, S.R., Hammersley, J.M.: Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes. Proc. Camb. Philosophical Soc. 53, 629–641 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Eden, M.: A two-dimensional growth process. In: Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, IV, Berkeley, CA, pp. 223–239 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaunt, D.S.: The critical dimension for lattice animals. J. Phys. A Math. General 13, L97–L101 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaunt, D.S., Sykes, M.F., Ruskin, H.: Percolation processes in \(d\)-dimensions. J. Phys. A Math. General 9, 1899–1911 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guttmann, A.J.: Polygons, Polyominoes, and Polycubes. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 775. Springer and Canopus Academic Publishing Ltd., Dordrecht (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harary, F.: Unsolved problems in the enumeration of graphs. Pub. Math. Inst. Hungarian Academy Sci. 5, 1–20 (1960)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen, I.: Counting polyominoes: a parallel implementation for cluster computing. In: Sloot, P.M.A., Abramson, D., Bogdanov, A.V., Gorbachev, Y.E., Dongarra, J.J., Zomaya, A.Y. (eds.) ICCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2659, pp. 203–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/3-540-44863-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Klarner, D.A.: Cell growth problems. Canadian J. Math. 19, 851–863 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Klarner, D.A., Rivest, R.L.: A procedure for improving the upper bound for the number of \(n\)-ominoes. Canadian J. Math. 25, 585–602 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lunnon, W.F.: Counting hexagonal and triangular polyominoes. In: Read, R.C. (ed.) Graph Theory and Computing, pp. 87–100. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Madras, N.: A pattern theorem for lattice clusters. Ann. Comb. 3, 357–384 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rands, B.M.I., Welsh, D.J.A.: Animals, trees and renewal sequences. IMA J. Appl. Math. 27, 1–17 (1981). Corrigendum 28, 107 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Redelmeier, D.H.: Counting polyominoes: yet another attack. Discrete Math. 36, 191–203 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sykes, M.F., Glen, M.: Percolation processes in two dimensions: I. Low-density series expansions. J. Phys. A Math. General 9, 87–95 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Temperley, H.N.V.: Combinatorial problems suggested by the statistical mechanics of domains and of rubber-like molecules. Phys. Rev. 2(103), 1–16 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gill Barequet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barequet, G., Shalah, M., Zheng, Y. (2017). An Improved Lower Bound on the Growth Constant of Polyiamonds. In: Cao, Y., Chen, J. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10392. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62389-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62389-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62388-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62389-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics