Skip to main content

Exploring the Resilience of Urban Systems Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10406))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the context of cites, a very innovative approach refers to the theory of urban resilience, which is represented by the ability of an urban system to absorb, adapt and respond to stresses and strains, including issues related to sustainability, governance and economic development. The paper aims at exploring the problems related to urban resilience, with specific attention to the use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) which constitute a recent approach for representing complex systems and for supporting scenario planning and strategic decision making. Starting from a real case related to the regeneration program of the city of Collegno (Italy), the paper illustrates the application of the FCM method for modeling urban resilience dynamics and for exploring future scenarios of transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meerow, S., Newell, J.P., Stults, M.: Defining urban resilience: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 147, 38–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desouza, K.C., Flanery, T.H.: Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities 25, 89–99 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olazabal, M., Pascual, U.: Use of fuzzy cognitive maps to study urban resilience and transformation. Environ. Innov. Societal Transitions 18, 18–40 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, P., Hugh, S.: Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. Sage Publication, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bottero, M.: A multi-methodological approach for assessing sustainability of urban projects. Manage. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 26(1), 138–154 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colucci, A.: Le città resilienti: approcci e strategie. Università degli studi di Pavia, Pavia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holling, C.S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holling, C.S.: Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze, P. (ed.) Engineering within Ecological Constraints. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockström J.: Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 15(4) (2010). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/

  10. Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H.: Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 24, 65–75 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Axelrod, R.: Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papageorgiou, E.I., Salmeron, J.L.: A review of fuzzy cognitive maps research during the last decade. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 21(1), 69–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Özesmi, U., Özesmi, S.: A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environ. Manage. 31(4), 518–531 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozemi, U., Ozemi, S.L.: Ecological models based on people knowledge: A multy – step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Model. 176, 43–64 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Misthos, L.S., Messaris, G., Damigos, D., Menegaki, M.: Exploring the perceived intrusion of mining into the landscape using the fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Eng. 101, 60–74 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jetter, A.: Fuzzy cognitive maps for engineering and technology management: what works in practice? In: PICMET Proceedings (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jetter, A., Schweinfort, W.: Building scenarios with fuzzy cognitive maps: an exploratory study of solar energy. Futures 43, 52–66 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jetter, A.J., Kok, K.: Fuzzy cognitive maps for futures studies – a methodological assessment of concepts and methods. Futures 61, 45–57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kok, K.: The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 122–133 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsadiras, A.K.: Comparing the inference capabilities of binary, trivalent and sigmoid fuzzy cognitive maps. Inf. Sci. 178, 3880–3894 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Storti, D.: L’analisi SWOT. In: Working paper. Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria, Roma (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bottero, M., Lami, I., Lombardi, P.: Analytic network process: la valutazione di scenari di trasformazione urbana e territoriale. Alinea, Firenze (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, P.S.: Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy? Urban Stud. 40(3), 581–601 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dente, B.: Understanding Policy Decisions. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, J.R.: An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives. Int. J. Project Manage. 32, 838–849 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Salmeron, J.L., Vidal, R., Mena, A.: Ranking fuzzy cognitive map based scenarios with TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 2443–2450 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A.: Verso una pianificazione antifragile: Come pensare al futuro senza prevederlo. FrancoAngeli editore, Milano (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gerogiannis, C.V., Maftei, A. V., Papageorgiou, I. E.: Critical success factors on online music streaming services, a case study of applying the fuzzy cognitive maps method. In: Conference paper, pp. 1077–1084 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L.J., Quinlan, A.E., Peterson, G.D., Wilkinson, C., et al.: Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan Urban resilience: What does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Plann. Theory Pract. 13(2), 299–333 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones, P.S.: Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy? Urban Stud. 40(3), 581–601 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahern, J.: From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape Urban Plann. 100, 341–343 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharif, A.M., Irani, Z.: Exploring fuzzy cognitive mapping for IS evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 173, 1175–1187 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Bottero, M., Mondini, G., Oppio, A.: Decision Support Systems for evaluating urban regeneration. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 923–928 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Monaco, R., Servente, G.: Introduzione ai modelli matematici nelle scienze territoriali. Celid, Torino (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Monaco, R.: A mathematical model for territorial integrated evaluation. In: Brunetta, Smart Evaluation and Integrated Design in Regional Development, Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Murgante, B., Borruso, G.: Smart cities in a smart world. In: Rassia, S.T., Pardalos, P.M. (eds.) Future City Architecture for Optimal Living. Springer Optimization and its Applications, vol. 102, pp. 13–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Axelrod, R.: Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The alternative projects used for the FCMs application are based on the work performed by the students of the multidisciplinary design studio “Architecture and Urban Economics” (professors Mauro Berta, Marta Bottero, Edoardo Piccoli and Francesca Bagliani) in the Master Program in Architecture Construction City at Politecnico di Torino (Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Bottero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bottero, M., Datola, G., Monaco, R. (2017). Exploring the Resilience of Urban Systems Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62397-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62398-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics