Skip to main content

Identification of High-Risk Hotspots Along Railway Lines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Abstract

Safety is a relevant issue in many context of the real life. The paper proposes a scientifically robust method for the identification of the top-N list of railway hotspots that can be used as input for the definition of a strategy of selective monitoring of the state of safety the railway network of an administrative unit (namely, a province, a region, a country, etc.), with respect to the exposure to the landslide hazard. The knowledge of the hotspots, as meant in this paper, is a conceptual tool for providing a rigorous analytical basis for narrowing down a global problem – train derailments – to smaller, highest risk, geographic areas where the management of the disaster risk is most crucial. To be applied, the method needs data about the railway lines to be kept under control and data about the geomorphology of the underlying terrain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blahut, J., Poretti, I., De Amicis, M., Sterlacchini, S.: Database of geo-hydrological disasters for civil protection purposes. Nat. Hazards 60, 1065–1083 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brabb, E.E., Harrod, B.L. (eds.): Landslides: Extent and Economic Significance, 385 pp. Balkema Publisher, Rotterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Di Felice, P., et al.: Ranking the buildings over a developed large geographic area according to their exposure to the landslide hazard. Eur. J. Geogr. 7(3), 6–24 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.: Categorizing binary topological relations between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Technical report, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine (1991) (revised versions in NCGIA Technical report 91-7 and NCGIA Technical report 94-1). http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~max/9intReport.pdf. Accessed Feb 2016

  5. Egenhofer, M., Shariff, A.R.: Metric details for natural-language spatial relations. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 16(4), 295–321 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fell, R., et al.: Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng. Geol. 102, 99–111 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., Galli, M.: Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81, 166–184 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He, H., Li, S., Sun, H.: Environmental factors of road slope stability in mountain area using principal component analysis and hierarchy cluster. Environ. Earth Sci. 62(1), 55–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hervás, J.: Encyclopedia of natural hazards. In: Bobrowsky, P.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, pp. 610–611 (2013). http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4020-4399-4_214

  10. Magliulo, P., Di Lisio, A., Russo, F.: Comparison of GIS-based methodologies for the landslide susceptibility assessment. GeoInformatica 13, 253–265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandal, S., Maiti, R.: Assessing the triggering rainfall-induced landslip events in the Shivkhola watershed of Darjiling, Himalaya, West Bengal. Eur. J. Geogr. 4(3), 21–37 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Open GISs Implementation Specification: Open GISs Implementation Specification for Geographic information – Simple Feature Access – Part2: SQL Option. Keith Ryden (ed.), Document: OGC05-134, 74 pp. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rawat, P.K., Tiwari, P.C., Pant, C.C.: Geo-hydrological database modeling for integrated multiple hazards and risk assessment in Lesser Himalaya: a GIS-based case study. Nat. Hazards 62, 1233–1260 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0144-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadler, J., et al.: GeoSRM – Online geospatial safety risk model for the GB rail network. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 10(1), 17–24 (2016). doi:10.1049/iet-its.2015.0038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SafeLand: Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk assessment and zoning. Deliverable D2.4 of the Safe Land research project, 7th EU Framework Programme (2011). http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/Pages/SafeLand.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolino Di Felice .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Felice, P., Di Felice, A., Evangelista, M., Fraticelli, A., Venturoni, L. (2017). Identification of High-Risk Hotspots Along Railway Lines. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10407. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62400-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62401-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics