Skip to main content

Hybrid Matrix Factorization Update for Progress Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 739))

Abstract

Intelligent Tutoring Systems often profit of intelligent components, which allow to personalize the proposed contents’ characteristics and sequence. Adaptive sequencing, in particular, requires either a detrimental data collection for users or extensive domain information provided by experts of the educational area. In this paper we propose an efficient domain independent method to model student progress that can be later used to sequence tasks in large commercial systems. The developed method is based on the integration of domain independent Matrix Factorization Performance Prediction with Kalman Filters state modeling abilities. Our solution not only reduces the prediction error, but also possesses a more computationally efficient model update. Finally, we give hints about a potential interpretability of student’s state computed by Matrix Factorization, that, because of its implicit modeling, did not allow human experts, to monitor user’s knowledge acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Phan, A.H., Amari, S.: Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations: Applications to Exploratory Multi-way Data Analysis and Blind Source Separation. Wiley.com, Chichester (2009). Wiley.com

  2. Corbett, A., Anderson, J.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. UMAI 4, 253–278 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in Bayesian knowledge tracing. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 406–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Janning, R., Schatten, C., Lars, S.-T.: Feature analysis for affect recognition supporting task sequencing. In: ECTEL (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janning, R., Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Multimodal affect recognition for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems. In: FFMI EDM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janning, R., Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Perceived task-difficulty recognition from log-file information for the use in adaptive intelligent tutoring systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26, 855–876 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalman, R.E.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Fluids Eng. 82(1), 35–45 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koren, Y., Bell, R., Volinsky, C.: Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8), 30–37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, B., Zhu, X., Li, R., Zhang, C., Xue, X., Wu, X.: Cross-domain collaborative filtering over time. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 2293–2298. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Vuorikari, R., Hummel, H., Koper, R.: Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 387–415. Springer, New York (2011). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Elsevier, San Diego (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pardos, Z.A., Heffernan, N.T.: Modeling individualization in a Bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing. In: Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pardos, Z.A., Heffernan, N.T.: KT-IDEM: introducing item difficulty to the knowledge tracing model. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 243–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pavlik, P., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.: Performance factors analysis-a new alternative to knowledge tracing. In: AIED (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pilászy, I., Tikk, D.: Recommending new movies: even a few ratings are more valuable than metadata. In: RecSys (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rendle, S., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Online-updating regularized kernel matrix factorization models for large-scale recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 251–258. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schatten, C., Janning, R., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Vygotsky based sequencing without domain information: a matrix factorization approach. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M.T., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds.) CSEDU 2014. CCIS, vol. 510, pp. 35–51. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25768-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Schatten, C., Janning, R., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Integration and evaluation of a machine learning sequencer in large commercial ITS. In: AAAI 2015. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schatten, C., Mavrikis, M., Janning, R., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Matrix factorization feasibility for sequencing and adaptive support in ITS. In: EDM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Adaptive content sequencing without domain information. In: CSEDU (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Student progress modeling with skills deficiency aware Kalman filters. In: CSEDU (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schatten, C., Wistuba, M., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Gutirrez-Santos, S.: Minimal invasive integration of learning analytics services in ITS. In: ICALT (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schilling, N., Wistuba, M., Drumond, L., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Joint model choice and hyperparameter optimization with factorized multilayer perceptrons. In: 2015 IEEE 27th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), pp. 72–79. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thai-Nghe, N., Drumond, L., Horvath, T., Krohn-Grimberghe, A., Nanopoulos, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Factorization techniques for predicting student performance. In: Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges. IGI Global (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thai-Nghe, N., Drumond, L., Horvath, T., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Using factorization machines for student modeling. In: UMAP Workshops (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thai-Nghe, N., Drumond, L., Krohn-Grimberghe, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Recommender system for predicting student performance. Procedia Comput. Sci. 1(2), 2811–2819 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vinagre, J., Jorge, A.M., Gama, J.: Fast incremental matrix factorization for recommendation with positive-only feedback. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 459–470. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_41

    Google Scholar 

  28. Voss, L., Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: A transfer learning approach for applying matrix factorization to small its datasets. In: EDM 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. HUP, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Y., Heffernan, N.T.: The student skill model. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 399–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Wistuba, M., Schilling, N., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Sequential model-free hyperparameter tuning. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 1033–1038. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xiong, L., Chen, X., Huang, T.-K., Schneider, J.G., Carbonell, J.G.: Temporal collaborative filtering with Bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization. In: SDM, vol. 10, pp. 211–222. SIAM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research has been co-funded by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission, through project iTalk2Learn (\(\#\)318051). www.iTalk2Learn.eu. This paper is an extended version of [21] presented at the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlotta Schatten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schatten, C., Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2017). Hybrid Matrix Factorization Update for Progress Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Costagliola, G., Uhomoibhi, J., Zvacek, S., McLaren, B. (eds) Computers Supported Education. CSEDU 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63183-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63184-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics