Skip to main content

Let Voices of Both Teachers and Students on the Development of Educational Technologies Be Heard

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education (EC-TEL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10474))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of adopting the Participatory Design (PD) approach in the development of educational technologies is to enhance their usefulness and usability. Nonetheless, many of the related PD activities only employ students as end-users to elicit requirements and feedback. Based on the empirical data of two workshops conducted with teachers and students, who were asked to provide feedback on the design of online lab-based lessons, we tend to conclude that involving teachers as well as students in such PD work can lead to a richer and more valuable source of information than students alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    (a) http://www.golabz.eu; (b) http://www.golabz.eu/lab/electrical-circuit-lab.

References

  • Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int’l. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38(3), 475–487 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, M.: Software-supported Participatory Design and Evaluation of the Tool PDot, Ph.D. thesis. University of Leicester (2017). Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, M., Law, E.L.-C., Soleimani, S.: Paper or pixel? comparing paper- and tool-based participatory design approaches. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9298, pp. 501–517. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22698-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, H., Rada, R.: Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 43(4), 343–367 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T.J.: Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Comput. Educ. 59(4), 1109–1121 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Large, A., Nesset, V., Beheshti, J., Bowler, L.: “Bonded design”: a novel approach to intergenerational information technology design. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 28(1), 64–82 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009). ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, J.Y., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P.W., Carey, T.: The state of user-centered design practice. Commun. ACM 48(3), 105–109 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, P., Bannon, L.J.: Exploring user-centred design in practice: Some caveats. Knowl. Technol. Policy 22(1), 7–15 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M., Druin, A.: Participatory design as third space in HCI. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Taylor and Francis (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, S., Vetere, F., Howard, S.: Teachers’ involvement in usability testing with children. In: Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2006), pp. 89–92. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L.A., De Jong, T., et al.: Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J.C., Fitton, D., Horton, M.: Giving ideas an equal chance: inclusion and representation in participatory design with children. In: Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2004), pp. 105–114. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the European Union in the context of the Go-Lab project (Grant Agreement no. 317601) under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) theme of the 7th Framework Programme for R&D (FP7). This document does not represent the opinion of the European Union, and the European Union is not responsible for any use that might be made of its content.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Effie Lai-Chong Law .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Law, E.LC., Edlin-White, R., Heintz, M. (2017). Let Voices of Both Teachers and Students on the Development of Educational Technologies Be Heard. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66609-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66610-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics