Skip to main content

Reducing Concept Lattices from Rough Set Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 901 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 641))

Abstract

Due to real databases usually contain redundant information, reducing them preserving the main information is one of the most important branches of study within the theory of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA). Taking advantage of the close relationship between Rough Set Theory (RST) and FCA, in this work, we address the problem of attribute reduction in FCA using the reduction mechanism given in RST. We analyze the properties obtained from this kind of reduction and show an illustrative example.

Partially supported by the State Research Agency (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) project TIN2016-76653-P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Originally, Ganter and Wille denoted these operators as \('\) and they were called derivation operators. We have modified this notation to distinguish between the mapping defined on objects and on attributes.

  2. 2.

    Observe that the discernibility matrix is symmetric matrix since the discernibility relation is reflexive.

  3. 3.

    For the sake of simplicity, we will write \((^{\uparrow _1},^{\downarrow ^1})\) and \((^{\uparrow _2},^{\downarrow ^2})\), instead of \((^{\uparrow _{D_1}},^{\downarrow ^{D_1}})\) and \((^{\uparrow _{D_2}},^{\downarrow ^{D_2}})\) to denote the concept-forming operators in the reduced contexts by \(D_1\) and \(D_2\), respectively.

References

  1. Chen, J., Li, J., Lin, Y., Lin, G., Ma, Z.: Relations of reduction between covering generalized rough sets and concept lattices. Inf. Sci. 304, 16–27 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornejo, M.E., Medina, J., Ramírez-Poussa, E.: Irreducible elements in multi-adjoint concept lattices. Int. Conf. Fuzzy Log. Technol. EUSFLAT 2013, 125–131 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornejo, M.E., Medina, J., Ramírez-Poussa, E.: Attribute reduction in multi-adjoint concept lattices. Inf. Sci. 294, 41–56 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Davey, B., Priestley, H.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Denecke, K., Erné, M., Wismath, S.L. (eds.): Galois Connections and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dias, S., Vieira, N.: Reducing the size of concept lattices: the JBOS approach. In: 7th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications (CLA 2010), vol. 672, pp. 80–91 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundation. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Medina, J.: Relating attribute reduction in formal, object-oriented and property-oriented concept lattices. Comput. Math. Appl. 64(6), 1992–2002 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Ruiz-Calviño, J.: On multi-adjoint concept lattices: definition and representation theorem. Technical report, University of Málaga (2006). http://www.satd.uma.es/matap/jmedina/MACL.zip

  10. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Skowron, A., Rauszer, C.: The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems, pp. 331–362. Springer, Netherlands (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wei, L., Qi, J.-J.: Relation between concept lattice reduction and rough set reduction. Knowl.-Based Syst. 23(8), 934–938 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eloísa Ramírez-Poussa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benítez-Caballero, M.J., Medina, J., Ramírez-Poussa, . (2018). Reducing Concept Lattices from Rough Set Theory. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66830-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics