Abstract
Plagiarism, which is one of the forms of academic misconducts, is problematic. It results in discouraging innovation, and losing trust in the academic community. We modeled the plagiarism for academic publications, by means of the similarity between textual contents, and citation relations. Furthermore, we adopted the model in our proposed method for plagiarism detection. We evaluate our method using two types of dataset, namely auto-simulated and manually judged dataset. Our experiment shows that our method outperforms the baseline, which only uses the similarity between textual contents, on the auto-simulated dataset and the manually judged one for the ACL sub-dataset.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
a competition for plagiarism detection.
- 4.
Target documents are a set of documents in a collection where source documents exist.
- 5.
Citation anchors refer to characters in citing sentences that point to documents in reference list.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G., Casadevall, A.: Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 109(42), 17028–17033 (2012). doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109. NAS
Kessler, M.M.: Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Documentation 14(1), 10–25 (1963). doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103. Wiley
Potthast, M., Gollub, T., Hagen, M., Graßegger, J., Kiesel, J., Michel, M., Oberländer, A., Tippmann, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Gupta, P., Rosso, P., Stein, B.: Overview of the 4th international competition on plagiarism detection. In: Forner, P., Karlgren, J., Womser-Hacker, C. (eds.) Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs (2012)
Gupta, P., Rosso, P.: Text reuse with ACL: (upward) trends. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2012 Special Workshop on Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries, pp. 76–82. ACL (2012)
Alzahrani, S., Palade, V., Salim, N., Abraham, A.: Using structural information and citation evidence to detect significant plagiarism cases in scientific publications. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 63(2), 286–312 (2012). doi:10.1002/asi.21651. Wiley
HaCohen-Kerner, Y., Tayeb, A., Ben-Dror, N.: Detection of simple plagiarism in computer science papers. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 421–429. ACL (2010)
Gipp, B., Meuschke, N.: Citation pattern matching algorithms for citation-based plagiarism detection: greedy citation tiling, citation chunking and longest common citation sequence. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 249–258. ACM (2011). doi:10.1145/2034691.2034741
Pertile, S.D.L., Moreira, V.P., Rosso, P.: Comparing and combining content-and citation-based approaches for plagiarism detection. J. Assn. Inf. Sci. Tec. 67(10), 2511–2526 (2016). doi:10.1002/asi.23593. Wiley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Soleman, S., Fujii, A. (2017). Plagiarism Detection Based on Citing Sentences. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67007-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67008-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)