Abstract
Physical samples are important resources for sample-based data reuse. They may be utilized in the reproduction of scientific findings, depending on their availability and accessibility. Although several solutions have been developed to curate and publish digital collections (e.g., publications and datasets), considerably less attention has been paid to providing access to physical samples, and linking them to data, reports, and other resources on the Internet. Some progress has been made to bring physical samples into the digital world; for example, through the web-identifier schemes, sample metadata standards and catalogues, and specimen digitization. Existing studies based on the above examples are either project or domain-specific. Also, a particular challenge exists in providing citable and resolvable identifiers for physical samples outside the context of an individual project or a sample data repository. Within the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), further work is needed in order to connect the various types of physical samples collected by different entities (individual researchers, projects and laboratories) to the Web, and enable their discovery. We address this need through the development a digital repository of physical samples. This paper presents technical and non-technical components of the repository. They were applied to unambiguously identify the various physical samples and to systematically provide continuous online access to their metadata and data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A collection may be a group of arbitrary specimens or an aggregation of specimens, e.g., rock chips.
- 2.
A sampling feature is an entity that is designed to observe some domain features. This may refer to the ‘locations’ where a sample was collected from such as drill-holes, wells, sections, and soil pits.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
The XML schema and its graphical representation are available at https://igsn.csiro.au/schemas/3.0/.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
A physical sample is usually compared with a reference sample.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
References
Bechtold, S.: Governance in namespaces. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev. 36(3), 1239–1320 (2003). doi:10.2139/ssrn.413681
Behnken, A., Wallrabe-Adams, H.J., Röhl, U., Krysiak, F.: Application of the IGSN for improved data - sample - drill core linkage. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 18, p. 16688, April 2016
Conze, R., Lorenz, H., Ulbricht, D., Elger, K., Gorgas, T.: Utilizing the international geo sample number concept in continental scientific drilling during ICDP expedition COSC-1. Data Sci. 16, 2 (2017). doi:10.5334/dsj-2017-002
Cox, S.J.D.: Geographic Information - Observations and Measurements (OGC Abstract Specification Topic 20) (same as ISO 19156:2011) (2011)
DataCite Metadata Working Group: DataCite Metadata Schema 4.0. Technical report, DataCite e.V., Hannover, Germany, May 2016. doi:10.5438/0012
Devaraju, A., Klump, J.F., Cox, S.J.D., Golodoniuc, P.: Representing and publishing physical sample descriptions. Comput. Geosci. 96, 1–10 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.018
Klump, J., Cox, S.J.D., Wyborn, L.A.I.: Connecting geology with the internet of things. In: Towards Unified Global Research. Melbourne, VIC, Australia, October 2014. http://eresearchau.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/eresau2014_submission_80.pdf
Klump, J., Huber, R.: 20 years of persistent identifiers - which systems are here to stay? Data Sci. J. 16, 9 (2017). doi:10.5334/dsj-2017-009
Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M., Warner, S.: Implementation guidelines for the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting. Technical report (2002). http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines.htm
Lehnert, K.A., Klump, J., Arko, R.A., Bristol, S., Buczkowski, B., Chan, C., Chan, S., Conze, R., Cox, S.J., Habermann, T., Hangsterfer, A., Hsu, L., Milan, A., Miller, S.P., Noren, A.J., Richard, S.M., Valentine, D.W., Whitenack, T., Wyborn, L.A., Zaslavsky, I.: IGSN e.V.: registration and identification services for physical samples in the digital universe. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011 (2011)
Lehnert, K., Carbotte, S., Ryan, W., Ferrini, V., Block, K., Arko, R., Chan, C.: IEDA: integrated earth data applications to support access, attribution, analysis, and preservation of observational data from the ocean, earth, and polar sciences. Geophysical Research Abstracts 13 (2011)
Lehnert, K.A., Vinayagamoorthy, S., Djapic, B., Klump, J.: The Digital Sample: Metadata, unique identification, and links to data and publications. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 87 (52, Fall Meet. Suppl.), Abstract IN53C-07 (2006). http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2006/FM/sections/IN/sessions/IN53C/abstracts/IN53C-07.html
McNutt, M., Lehnert, K.A., Hanson, B., Nosek, B.A., Ellison, A.M., King, J.L.: Liberating field science samples and data. Science 351(6277), 1024–1026 (2016). http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1024
Schindler, U., Diepenbroek, M.: Generic XML-based framework for metadata portals. Comput. Geosci. 34(12), 1947–1955 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.023
The Australian Antarctic program (AAp): The Australian Antarctic program data policy 2014 (applied to projects approved between 2 April 2013 and 21 June 2015). Online (June 2015). https://data.aad.gov.au/aadc/about/data_policy_2014.cfm
The National Science Foundation: Proposal and award policies and procedures guide (part ii - award & administration guide). Online February 2014. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf14001/aagprint.pdf
Wieczorek, J., Bloom, D., Guralnick, R., Blum, S., DÅ‘ring, M., Giovanni, R., Robertson, T., Vieglais, D.: Darwin core: an evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE 7(1), e29715 (2011). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
Acknowledgments
The IGSN implementation in CSIRO is part of the Research Data Services (RDS) project funded by the Department of Education as part of their Education Investment Fund (EIF) Super Science Initiative. The Capricorn Distal Footprints was funded by the Science and Industry Endowment Fund as part of The Distal Footprints of Giant Ore Systems: UNCOVER Australia Project (RP04-063).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Devaraju, A., Klump, J., Tey, V., Fraser, R., Cox, S., Wyborn, L. (2017). A Digital Repository for Physical Samples: Concepts, Solutions and Management. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67007-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67008-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)